Il 24/10/2016 22:15, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> +1. It's confusing since people are opening PRs against master_2 when as
> far as I know this branch is a dead end.
It makes sense to me. Any reason not to close it immediately?
Also, I'd close commits for 2.16, and mark is as unmaintained. Keeping
2
On 24 Oct 2016 10:35 PM, "Sandro Santilli" wrote:
>
> Now that 2.18 is out and its release-2_18 branch was created,
> and given the decision for 2.18 to be the last release in
> the 2.x series, should the "master_2" be removed ?
+1. It's confusing since people are opening PRs against master_2 whe
Now that 2.18 is out and its release-2_18 branch was created,
and given the decision for 2.18 to be the last release in
the 2.x series, should the "master_2" be removed ?
And maybe the roadmap table [1] should be updated to add
3.0 release ?
[1] https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/developmen