Hi all.
If I understand correctly, the default for manual production is make
pdf. Is there a reason why we did not choose make latexpdf?
BTW, make pdf is producing invalid pdf here:
Error: May not be a PDF file (continuing anyway)
Error: PDF file is damaged - attempting to reconstruct xref table..
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi all.
> If I understand correctly, the default for manual production is make
> pdf. Is there a reason why we did not choose make latexpdf?
> BTW, make pdf is producing invalid pdf here:
>
> Error: May not be a PDF file (continuing anyway)
Il 27/04/2012 10:27, Paolo Corti ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo
>
> no one still decided, at least me, if to go with latexpdf or pdf (that
> is using rst2pdf).
latexpdf seems more picky, and the results seem cleaner to me.
> In any case, regarding your error: do you have in your system PIL? [1]
Do not know
>> In any case, regarding your error: do you have in your system PIL? [1]
> Do not know, I didn't find a package with a similar name. However, other
> sources build fine.
Paolo, You should look for 'python-imaging' in Debian.
___
Qgis-developer mailing li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 28/04/2012 11:43, Ivan Mincik ha scritto:
>>> In any case, regarding your error: do you have in your system PIL? [1]
>> Do not know, I didn't find a package with a similar name. However, other
>> sources build fine.
> Paolo, You should look for 'py
hi
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Paolo Corti wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Paolo Cavallini
> wrote:
>> Hi all.
>> If I understand correctly, the default for manual production is make
>> pdf. Is there a reason why we did not choose make latexpdf?
>> BTW, make pdf is producing inv
