Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos

​Thanks​ for the clarifications Victor! > -Oprindelig meddelelse- > Fra: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto: > qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] På vegne af Victor Olaya > if an algorithm is repeated in several backends, only one of them is added > to the simplified inte

Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos

Fra: qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] På vegne af Victor Olaya Sendt: 29. juli 2015 11:55 Til: Anita Graser Cc: qgis-developer Emne: Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos The idea of the simplified interf

Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos

Graser Cc: qgis-developer Emne: Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos The idea of the simplified interface was to have an interface that was more understandable for users with less experience, so you do not have to know if the algorithm comes from

Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos

The idea of the simplified interface was to have an interface that was more understandable for users with less experience, so you do not have to know if the algorithm comes from GRASS, SAGA or whatever. That might be useful for advanced users, but it is confusing for the rest of them. Also, if an

Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos

Agree – this is always an issue for my students – ”I can´t find the tool” Regards Lene Fischer Associate Professor Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management University of Copenhagen MOB +45 40115084 l...@ign.ku.dk [cid:image001.gif@01D03029.2F3EC6A0]

Re: [Qgis-developer] Simplified Processing interface doesn't list GRASS algos

Thanks for weighing in Oliver! On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Olivier Dalang wrote: > I agree, here the two interfaces also cause only confusion, and it's not > that obvious how the simple interface is simpler than the normal one. > > For me we can keep just one. > ​I would like to hear from o