Hi
I have some questions concerning the performance of qgis mapserver: Using
layers with a small amount of polygons I do not see a big difference between
rendering the same layer straight from postgis and from local qgis mapserver
installation. For a layer with some 400'000 polygons it takes
Hi Stefan,
There are some performance bottlenecks regarding clipping of larger/more
complex polygons. Marco can tell you more.
What exactly do you mean by rendering straight from postgis? What
software is rendering straight from Postgis? UMN Mapserver, or what
other renderer? Or your own
A couple thoughts on this - I mentioned the desire for these kinds of docs
on the discus list, thread titled [Live-demo] Has anyone written a How do
you XXX with Open Source GIS?
There was a helpful link for udig
http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/EN/Home
On the esri front, there is
Hi Mike,
Those are some interesting links and thoughts.
The udig link is to this, yes?
http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/HACK/Desktop+GIS+Comparisons
(or alternatively
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Case_Studies#Web_Client_Comparison)
With the images, two thoughts:
1. I should
I thought this problem merely related to the failure of Australian
projections. Projection data doesn't exist, therefore can't be exported
with the shape file.
If the points are imported as WGS84 / UTMz51S, then export the shape
file, the projection file contains the relevant information. Its
