Re: [Qgis-user] 3D dxf files

2013-12-19 Thread gene
Looking at the awk script of Siki Zoltan, I made Python scripts using regular expressions that works : In the dxf file, A 3D face polygon is located between the two delimiters: *3DFace* . * 0* (the spaces before the 0 are important here, because there are also coordinates equal to 0, withou

Re: [Qgis-user] Weekly builds and JP2 files

2013-12-19 Thread Jonathan Moules
*Even,* Thanks for the information. I agree with the ideal of a FOSS JP2 library but we're not in a position to contribute towards it; at best it's ancilliary to our needs. At worst I could use any one of a number of other formats, it just so happens that for now the data is in JP2. Jürgen, Ok, th

Re: [Qgis-user] Weekly builds and JP2 files

2013-12-19 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi, On Thu, 19. Dec 2013 at 16:33:01 +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Um, maybe not overly clear. _didn't_ was meant to imply that they do now. > The last nightly builds already depended on gdal-ecw/mrsid and in turn the > next weekly will, too. Correction: Only the 64bit build already did, but

Re: [Qgis-user] Weekly builds and JP2 files

2013-12-19 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Jonathan Moules : > I'm wondering - is there a reason that the JP2Open is distributed with > QGIS/GDAL given it seems to do a terrible job? At least it does with all > the ones I've tested against. Could the JP2ECW be distributed as the > default instead? It depends on the images. On tiled

Re: [Qgis-user] Weekly builds and JP2 files

2013-12-19 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, 19. Dec 2013 at 15:16:05 +, Jonathan Moules wrote: > I'm wondering - is there a reason that the JP2Open is distributed with > QGIS/GDAL given it seems to do a terrible job? At least it does with all the > ones I've tested against. Could the JP2ECW be distributed as the def

Re: [Qgis-user] Weekly builds and JP2 files

2013-12-19 Thread Jonathan Moules
I'm wondering - is there a reason that the JP2Open is distributed with QGIS/GDAL given it seems to do a terrible job? At least it does with all the ones I've tested against. Could the JP2ECW be distributed as the default instead? (again, I'm using the weekly build here). Cheers, Jonathan On 18

Re: [Qgis-user] gdalbuildvrt - setting scale dependent visibility

2013-12-19 Thread Alexandre Neto
Graham, You need to create the overlays (pyramids) for the virtual raster. You can do it directly in QGIS: - Turn render off; - Load the Virtual raster; - Open Layer properties (right-click) and go to Pyramids - Select all the resolutions proposed and press Build pyramids. Or you can do it u

[Qgis-user] gdalbuildvrt - setting scale dependent visibility

2013-12-19 Thread Graham
Hi, When using gdalbuildvrt to create a virtual raster, is there a way to specify the scale dependent visibility of the vrt that is being created? My reason for this question is that when displaying a vrt containing a large number of rasters QGIS 2.0.1 takes a very long time to open up the Layer P