Hi,
I would prefere another solution instead of changing the releases. The
documentation team is in the same situation. We are always behind the
releases, but the problem I see is that there are not enough people working
on the documents. At the moment we were not even able to start updating the
m
Andre Joost wrote
> Am 18.07.2014 11:31, schrieb Pedro:
>
>>
>> Even after simplified the geometries I still don't see the layer.
>> I must be doing some very basic mistake
>>
>> Can you please look at the screenshots from my first post and see if
>> there
>> is something wrong;
>
> I don't
Andre Joost wrote
> Am 18.07.2014 11:31, schrieb Pedro:
>
>>
>> Even after simplified the geometries I still don't see the layer.
>> I must be doing some very basic mistake
>>
>> Can you please look at the screenshots from my first post and see if
>> there
>> is something wrong;
>
> I don't
Hi Otto,
You make some excellent points. Just to follow on one of them:
But usually customers and developers don't think about also spending
an additional
> little amount to document the feature in the QGIS docs and training
> material.
I think that's a QGIS problem. I know when I get quotes for
+1 to what Otto said. Very good point. Those creating training materials
should coordinate and help the core QGIS documentation (both the manual and
the training manual) improve.
> The solution is very simple: Require up to date, accurate documentation
> for all commits of new features. This is o
+ 1 to Otto and Victor.
Developers should develop, the can document some aspects of
code/feature (and they
already do this!) but we can not ask them to write manuals
2014-07-22 13:01 GMT+03:00 Victor Olaya :
> +1 to what Otto said. Very good point. Those creating training materials
> should coord
Except that self-evidently the current solution doesn't work well. Of the
three projects I listed, QGIS has by far the worst documentation; as Otto
noted, they've not even started updating for 2.4 yet.
Just looking now, not a single one of the "QGIS Geoalgorithms" that I've
ever looked at (which a
>
>
> Just looking now, not a single one of the "QGIS Geoalgorithms" that I've
> ever looked at (which are I think is what Victor is referencing) have
> anything in the "help" tab. And these are a core part of the software.
>
>
Yes that's what I mean. But, IMHO, it's better to have that functionali
Is it not possible to require an absolutely minimum entry, at the correct place
in the docs, for a new feature? For example, if a developer adds a new
function X to a list of existing functions, already documented in section M.N,
then at a minimum they need to add an entry saying "Function X (
Il 22/07/2014 12:41, Victor Olaya ha scritto:
...
> I am not saying that this is ideal, and that developers should not write
> docs. I am
> saying that time is limited and, if we put those restrictions, we might end up
> rejecting a lot of interesting functionality.
Sorry for jumping in late. The
Il 22/07/2014 13:21, Jonathan Moules ha scritto:
> Fair point, but then I'd ask - what would the cost be? Is it not something
> that can
> be covered by the current sponsorship given that a significant (or maybe just
> significantly vocal ;-) ) portion of the community seems to be interested in
I confirm this. On the Advanced Interface, the "GRASS commands" all appear
to be fine, but anything under "GRASS GIS 7 commands" fails with a wall of
Python error:
An error has occured while executing Python code:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "C:/PROGRA~1/QGISCH~1/apps/qgis/./py
Hi, Paolo,
sorry for my late answer.
Your idea is do a feature request to put a DTM style as one of the default
color ramps in raster proprieties dialog?
I can put a feat. req., please confirm if this is your thought.
Regards
João
2014-07-21 6:24 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 20/07/2014 1
Il 22/07/2014 15:03, João Gaspar ha scritto:
> Your idea is do a feature request to put a DTM style as one of the default
> color
> ramps in raster proprieties dialog?
>
> I can put a feat. req., please confirm if this is your thought.
exactly.
thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Cor
ct-city: elevation or wiki-schwarzwald-cont or both?
João
2014-07-22 14:03 GMT+01:00 João Gaspar :
> Hi, Paolo,
>
> sorry for my late answer.
>
> Your idea is do a feature request to put a DTM style as one of the default
> color ramps in raster proprieties dialog?
>
> I can put a feat. req., pl
Il 22/07/2014 15:08, João Gaspar ha scritto:
> ct-city: elevation or wiki-schwarzwald-cont or both?
better choose one, to avoid the drunkman syndrome ;)
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
___
Ahahah,
DONE
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10925
2014-07-22 14:10 GMT+01:00 Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 22/07/2014 15:08, João Gaspar ha scritto:
> > ct-city: elevation or wiki-schwarzwald-cont or both?
>
> better choose one, to avoid the drunkman syndrome ;)
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Otto Dassau wrote:
>
>
> a) Trainers could combine their forces and prepair general training
> materials
> together that everybody can use and extend. All tools and the document
> basis
> is available and provided by QGIS project in the documentation rep
Am 22.07.2014 11:22, schrieb Pedro:
It´s exactly that, the file generated by the OGR2Layers only open the qgis
layer correctly in Firefox!
With IE or Chrome I can never see the qgis layer.
It's a limitation in the plugin but it works.
If you search for "OpenLayers Internet Explorer", you wil
> Is it a common practice for developer to fill feature requests for
> Documentation and help whenever they create new features? This would still
> free developers to keep creating good stuff, and help others to keep track
> of what needs attention in Docs. Using the visual changelog and scrolling
Am 22.07.2014, 12:16 Uhr, schrieb Derek Hohls :
Is it not possible to require an absolutely minimum entry, at the
correct place in the docs, for a new feature? For example, if a
developer adds a new function X to >a list of existing functions,
already documented in section M.N, then at a
Hi,
I don't think splitting development resources to maintain an LTS branch is
going to solve the real issues. In fact, it will probably just cause more.
It seems to me that it all boils down to needing more time between releases:
* Documentation and development teams need to work more together
Hi All,
It is hard to figure out where in the conversation to interject but
Victors counter-suggestion appears appropriate to me.
Being involved in several open source projects, creating tutorials for
these and having in the past been involved with trying to contribute to
the main documentat
Hi
I am new here, but in trouble with Qgis.
I have a BAD problem with decimal numbers in shapefile attribute tables.
My set:
Ubuntu Linux 12.04
Qgis 2.2
Locale FI
Example:
The original number in attribute table is: 342,52189242800
Using binary editor I can see, that the internal format in db
Hi!
Is it possible to provide the shapefile somewhere to take a closer look at it?
regards
Werner
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Hakala Oiva (MTT) wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am new here, but in trouble with Qgis.
>
> I have a BAD problem with decimal numbers in shapefile attribute tables.
>
> My set:
>
Thanks Werner. It is possible to send a shapefile, but the problem is not tied
with any specific shapefile. The problem is with every shapefile. And if I
remember right there was also a problem with ArcGrid. All the grid values
turned also to integers.
I will send the shapefile privately in a s
Dear list,
I use QGIS Valmiera and try to load a tiled WMS Service from geoserver (version 2.5.1).
My problem is, that i can only load the tileset over the Toolbar-Dialog (load WMS/WMTS Button).
If i try to load the same Service in the Browser Tab e.g. with drag and drop QGIS load a WMS
I´ve now been using-, bug reporting- and making tutorials for QGIS since 1.7
and I still find it difficult to make stable contributions in several ways: In
this tread everyone write ‘more money’ or ‘Work together’
I want to donate time – but find it difficult to find a limited project. As
every
28 matches
Mail list logo
