Raymond - thanks for clarifying the context!
ciao
Andrea Giacomelli
http://www.pibinko.org
i...@pibinko.org
+39 331 7539228
P. IVA: 01582480537
2017-07-04 9:49 GMT+02:00 Raymond Nijssen :
> Pro bono.
>
> (Wouldn't dare to ask money for my first video editing task. :D)
>
Hi
I need to use the Inverse Distance Weighted Interpolation from SAGA
within qGIS, which I did with a previous version of qGIs but this time
it didn't work because of a missing library (qGIS 2.18.9 - windows8 pro,
64bits).
I updated the qGIS version with the latest 2.18.10 (windows8 pro,
Hi Richard,
Yes, I’ve come to much the same conclusion: dummy features of the correct
topology is the easiest way to force QGIS.
I tried to publish the geometry_column table via WFS, as this contains the
topology designations, and have QGIS load that via WFS.
But it seems that this logic
Hi Falk,
Il 03/07/2017 20:03, Falk Huettmann ha scritto:
> my questions to you are:
> -how can those data be served best to support QGIS, e.g. as a package or
> plugin,
> and is that needed and wanted ?
I think they can be a very useful addition. Perhaps they could replace
or be added to the
Pro bono.
(Wouldn't dare to ask money for my first video editing task. :D)
On 03-07-17 12:27, Andrea Giacomelli wrote:
Hi Raymond, and thanks for the appreciation on the video!
I knew it was partially out of scope, but it was also to present ideas
and a setting that may be tuned to focus
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the reply.
I failed to mention, that I’m using MS/SQL 2016 as my database, but I should be
able to add geometry constraint in it.
But then again, I want to tell QGIS that it’s a line layer, and I’m uncertain
whether such proposed database constraints will do that,