Re: [Qgis-user] [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

Hi Richard Thanks for clarifying your ideas. Could we not implement something similar to how WMS-T works in that we have a PostgreSQL-T provider extension for example that passes a time filter to the underlying data base request. In another system we are build for a client we have some logic to fe

Re: [Qgis-user] [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

Hi Richard, I think the underlying issue here is that QGIS does not do data management... It just accesses data (whether not managed, managed or mismanaged). You are correct, the traditional GIS model of a feature with attributes does not map to the real world very well in many use cases, and t

Re: [Qgis-user] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

Hi Richard, On 02.09.2022 13:07, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: Anybody is aware of a model in which data owns a location, but THAT location has a (growing) set of [timestamp, value] observation data to it MobilityDB has temporal temporal bools, ints, floats, texts, and geometries: https://do

Re: [Qgis-user] [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

On 9/4/22 15:27, Matthias Kuhn wrote: Hi Richard, It seems to me this should be possible using: 1. Two tables: - Points - Measurements (Timestamp, Measured attribute) 2.  A view (Points LEFT JOIN Measurements) What would be the actual result in your case (eg in the case of 2 points with 10

Re: [Qgis-user] [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

On 9/4/22 14:35, Tim Sutton wrote: Hi Richard Don’t people normally use things like https://www.timescale.com/

Re: [Qgis-user] [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

Hi Richard Don’t people normally use things like https://www.timescale.com/ For this? In any case some of our clients that are doing things like vehicle tracking are… Regards Tim Sent from my iPhone > On 2 Sep 2022, at 13:07, Richard Duivenvoorde via QGIS-Developer > wrote: > > Hi All,