[Qgis-user] QGIS 2.16 for OS X?

Hi, Are QGIS builds for OS X available yet? As far as I can tell the link on the website just shows 2.14 for download. It's been a little while since release now (and QGIS itself is reminding me to upgrade now!), so I wonder if I'm looking in the wrong place? Cheers, Robin

Re: [Qgis-user] Set default view for Identify window?

g it. > > Cheers, > > Andy > > On 20/10/2015 19:14, Robin Wilson wrote: >> On 20 Oct 2015, at 12:14, Nathan Woodrow < >> <mailto:madman...@gmail.com>madman...@gmail.com >> <mailto:madman...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I

Re: [Qgis-user] Psuedo-color raster legends

Hi Benoit, and everyone else, On 4 Nov 2015, at 16:44, Benoit de Cabissole wrote: > Your point 1: in theory yes; but I'm personally do not feel at ease > contributing to such a repository. I rather have my plugins in our own > repository: 1, because they serve well our

Re: [Qgis-user] Psuedo-color raster legends

On 4 Nov 2015, at 15:44, Fernando M. Roxo da Motta wrote: >> >> >> Hi Robin, >> >> Regarding your point 1 below, please see the latest version (0.9.0) of >> "Color Scale Bar for One-Band Rasters" (bccscbar) at >> http://www.bc-consult.com/free/bccscbar.html [3]. It is now

[Qgis-user] Psuedo-color raster legends

Hi, I do a lot of visualisation of raster layers using the pseudo-color symbology, but I don't like how the legends are produced: they just show the individual colors for each of the specific values you've selected in the symbology dialog box (see

[Qgis-user] Set default view for Identify window?

Hi, I've recently found the 'Table' and 'Graph' views that are available in the QGIS Identify docked window - and they're great. Is there a way to set one of these as the default view, as opposed to the 'standard' default view of Tree? If not, I'd be happy to have a go at implementing this -

Re: [Qgis-user] Set default view for Identify window?

On 20 Oct 2015, at 12:14, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > > I'm keen to kill that dock and replace it with something better in the next > version or version after. Open to ideas on that. > Did you have any specific ideas yourself? I'm keen to see it work as well as possible -