Hi Harrissou and others,
With your steps described below it was perfectly clear what I had to do,
no confusion in my mind whatsoever. So I just tried to compare it to the
documentation (link:
Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 à 19:18, Janneke van Dijk a
écrit :
> Hi Harrissou,
>
> thanks for the quick intervention :-).
>
You are welcome.
And it's all good; your pull request is at the right place. It's time for
reviewers, now!
> Indeed, I did read about the trap, but wasn't sure where I was
Hi Harrissou,
thanks for the quick intervention :-). Indeed, I did read about the
trap, but wasn't sure where I was supposed to encounter it. I've done it
again following your short description and that I think has worked...Let
me know if I am still supposed to press more buttons...I'll have
Hi Janneke,
I guess you are talking about
https://github.com/janneke-qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/1 which is
unfortunately a pull-request against your own branch and not the upstream
one. This is a trap we all fall in at the beginning and mentioned at
Hi Alexandre and Harrissou (and others),
I'm trying to feel my way through the contribution thing and github by
starting with some small remarks/changes I suggested myself. I think I
have just made an edit and created a pull request - it tells me 'This
branch has no conflicts with the base
Screenshots shouldn't be a blocker, you can take screenshots using windows.
Then, if we have time, we can replace windows screenshots later.
A seg, 7/01/2019, 18:17, Janneke van Dijk escreveu:
> Yes, I would be up for learning how to do it. I remember once upon a time
> trying to get started
Yes, I would be up for learning how to do it. I remember once upon a
time trying to get started and somehow getting stranded before I got
anywhere. Partly because I couldn't get linux to work on VM on my laptop
so I couldn't do the screen shots.
On 07/01/2019 17:39, Alexandre Neto wrote:
Hi,
Alex, I did.
For your information, from chapter 4 to 6 I have a bunch of PRs coming soon
and I will ensure these issues are addressed, if not yet done. Reason why I
self-assigned.
For the others, indeed, maybe you can give it a try. You'll find people
here ready to help you.
Regards,
Some of those changes are quite small. Would you be interested in learning
how to fix it yourself?
A seg, 7/01/2019, 14:37, Alexandre Neto escreveu:
>
>
> Actually, someone already did it. Thanks!!
>
> A seg, 7/01/2019, 14:37, Alexandre Neto escreveu:
>
>> I can do it.
>>
>> A seg, 7/01/2019,
Actually, someone already did it. Thanks!!
A seg, 7/01/2019, 14:37, Alexandre Neto escreveu:
> I can do it.
>
> A seg, 7/01/2019, 13:43, Janneke van Dijk
> escreveu:
>
>> I've registered all that I've noticed, I just didn't manage to tag them
>> with training manual. Should I do that or is
I can do it.
A seg, 7/01/2019, 13:43, Janneke van Dijk escreveu:
> I've registered all that I've noticed, I just didn't manage to tag them
> with training manual. Should I do that or is that someone else who adds the
> labels?
> Janneke
>
> On 07/01/2019 00:42, Alexandre Neto wrote:
>
> Better
I've registered all that I've noticed, I just didn't manage to tag them
with training manual. Should I do that or is that someone else who adds
the labels?
Janneke
On 07/01/2019 00:42, Alexandre Neto wrote:
Better duplicated issues than missing ones . So please report whatever
you feel that
Better duplicated issues than missing ones . So please report whatever you
feel that is a bug, or a possible improvement. That way we won't forget.
Thanks!
A dom, 6/01/2019, 10:07, Janneke van Dijk escreveu:
> Hi Harrissou,
>
> Getting ready to at least list my observations. Do I understand
13 matches
Mail list logo