Hi,
Actually, users-oriented-crowdfundings have proven quite successful in the
past. And it works something like this:
- A small number of non-developers members of the community (aka users)
discuss and gather ideas of how to improve or implement a certain feature;
- They contact one or more core
Hi Tobias,
On 30/09/19 21:32, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
> Maybe we should think about a concept, LibreOffice uses: Either a user
> delivers a patch or pays for the bug fix or feature.
this is what we are suggesting, and what we do normally.
> Croundfunding is
> unfortunately still too expensive
c
Dear Régis,
thanks for your words.
I'm DevOps for myself, not in an open source project, but I know the
adversity and I also have a life after work (LoL, no, I don't).
Financially it is not possible for me to support developers of FOSS. All
I can do is report bugs, suggest improvements, and dist
Hi Tobias,
thanks for raising issues here. The state of the geometry checking tools
indeed needs some work and rencetralisation of legacy tools.
Still, I suggest you take a look to this nice presentation we had in latest
FOSS4G
https://media.ccc.de/v/bucharest-322-the-secret-life-of-open-source-dev
Hi there,
I like the "Check Geometries". It's damn slow, but it's damn powerful
and it really finds problems in geometries (other than GEOS often does).
But what I don't like is the bad integration in QGIS3.
1. The "run" button is hidden on the "last page", not on the same dialog
like "close". S
