Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-05 Thread Andre Joost
Am 04.12.12 22:56, schrieb Victor Olaya: Many people mention documentation. As I said, we are interested in documenting how to develop with SEXTANTE, which is a great priority in order to keep the project alive. However, I guess most people are talking about user documentation. Do you mean

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-05 Thread Ramon Andiñach
On 05/12/2012, at 19:32 , Andre Joost wrote: Am 04.12.12 22:56, schrieb Victor Olaya: Many people mention documentation. As I said, we are interested in documenting how to develop with SEXTANTE, which is a great priority in order to keep the project alive. However, I guess most people are

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-04 Thread Bhaskaran
My top three priorities are: 1) Documentation 2) Documentation 3) Documentation I am sure there are other things to develop. However, at the moment the knowledge of Sextante and QGIS is with a few users/developers. Majority of the users struggle for a while and move on to use commercial apps. So

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-04 Thread Victor Olaya
Many people mention documentation. As I said, we are interested in documenting how to develop with SEXTANTE, which is a great priority in order to keep the project alive. However, I guess most people are talking about user documentation. Do you mean algorithm documentation? Documentation about

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-03 Thread Pirmin Kalberer
Hi Victor Am Freitag, 30. November 2012, 23.52:20 schrieb Victor Olaya: [.] Let's start with the second point How do you think we should spend this money on SEXTANTE? My personal priority list: 1. Reanimate Python code export 2. Support for database tables as input and output types

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-02 Thread Paulo van Breugel
+1 for bug fixing and testing as priority 1 On Dec 1, 2012 5:15 PM, Filipe Dias filipesd...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I also think that the most important thing now is to fix existing bugs and to test all Sextante algorithms. From what I see in the bugtracker, I suspect there are entire areas of

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-01 Thread Alexander Bruy
Hi Victor, On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:52:20 +0100 Victor Olaya vola...@gmail.com wrote: Let's start with the second point How do you think we should spend this money on SEXTANTE? I think first we should fix as much bugs as possible (now there are 76 tickets in bugtracker). Also important

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-01 Thread Bernd Vogelgesang
Am 30.11.2012, 23:52 Uhr, schrieb Victor Olaya vola...@gmail.com: Hi all As you might know, the SEXTANTE project started some time ago at the University of Extremadura (Spain), where I was working. I started creating the QGIS version at the beginning of this year, and now I do not work for the

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-12-01 Thread Filipe Dias
Hi, I also think that the most important thing now is to fix existing bugs and to test all Sextante algorithms. From what I see in the bugtracker, I suspect there are entire areas of Sextante that haven't been tested by anyone at all (there are almost no tickets for Orfeo for example). I've been

Re: [Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap (Victor Olaya)

2012-12-01 Thread Sergio Zárate
Hello, Victor, thanks for asking... If Santa Claus were to bring wish list presents, I want him to buy us a nicely packaged SEXTANTE for Mac OS! Saludos Sergio -- Dr. Sergio Zárate Pedroche José María Arroyo 228 Col. 22 de octubre Morelia, Michoacán C.P. 58341 México

[Qgis-user] Defining the SEXTANTE roadmap

2012-11-30 Thread Victor Olaya
Hi all As you might know, the SEXTANTE project started some time ago at the University of Extremadura (Spain), where I was working. I started creating the QGIS version at the beginning of this year, and now I do not work for the University, but I am still mantaining it. The University has some