Am 13.07.2014 06:14, schrieb zehari:
dear all,
thanks for information.
Before, ECW JPEG2000 SDK v51 it worked fine on my QGIS2.2.
but when i format the boot partition and I installed new ubuntu 14:04, and
I installed a new QGIS.2.4 and also install ECW.JPEG2000.SDK.v51, but the
program (QIS2.4)
Hi Nathan,
On Sat, 12. Jul 2014 at 14:56:28 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
I never thought there was a issue on Ubuntu. I thought we uploaded the
built package ourself.
We only build qgis for debian/ubuntu.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel.
dear all,
thanks for information.
Before, ECW JPEG2000 SDK v51 it worked fine on my QGIS2.2.
but when i format the boot partition and I installed new ubuntu 14:04, and
I installed a new QGIS.2.4 and also install ECW.JPEG2000.SDK.v51, but the
program (QIS2.4) can not open the ECW file again.
and
Dear All,
I have installed a new ubuntu 14:04 by removing ubuntu 13:10. Then, I
installed QGIS2.4 program, but can no longer open ECW files, while the
previous version is still functioning.
Can anyone help me, why is this happening?
For his help I would like to thank.
regards,
Zehari
On 07/11/2014 09:21 PM, zehari wrote:
Dear All,
I have installed a new ubuntu 14:04 by removing ubuntu 13:10. Then, I
installed QGIS2.4 program, but can no longer open ECW files, while the
previous version is still functioning.
Can anyone help me, why is this happening?
For his help I would
The information in that post is incorrect. You are allowed to redistribute
them. They are not open source but there is no desktop restriction on the
libraries.
On Jul 12, 2014 2:31 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 07/11/2014 09:21 PM, zehari wrote:
Dear All,
I have
We went though it with the ERDAS guys and they said its fine to
redistribute.
I never thought there was a issue on Ubuntu. I thought we uploaded the
built package ourself.
Nathan
On Jul 12, 2014 2:52 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
Well it's more of a 1/2 truth. You are
Well it's more of a 1/2 truth. You are correct that they are likely
distributable (I'm more familiar with MrSID issues). However, not in a
mainstream Debian or Ubuntu repository where it's license would prohibit
it from being uploaded. It may be a candidate for a non-free repo but
that would
