Hi Andrea,
WMS allows extensions and GetPrint is one of them. BTW: GetPrint is what
many organizations find quite attractive. If we improve GetPrint to also
allow to generate data-sheets and reports by using Atlas functionality
it will be even more powerful. So I'd rather see GetPrint
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 11. Jun 2014 at 08:39:11 +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
It is true that in some cases we need to improve to be more standards
compliant. This is a group effort. Everybody can contribute. Removing
GetPrint from GetCapabilities, or implementing in a standard compliant way,
Dockable.mirrormap.
Il 11/giu/2014 03:17 Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:38 AM, aperi2007 aperi2...@gmail.com wrote:
To response to you point of view:
I can only say that we
are fund some plugin.at 1.8 level.
With the break api of the 2.0 we must to
And what changed that broke it between the 2.x releases
On Jun 11, 2014 10:09 PM, Andrea Peri aperi2...@gmail.com wrote:
Dockable.mirrormap.
Il 11/giu/2014 03:17 Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:38 AM, aperi2007 aperi2...@gmail.com wrote:
To response
https://github.com/faunalia/dockablemirrormap/issues
we didn't changed plugin since time, Saber has experienced problems
rendering (it does not display),
at the moment I can't check if it's a regression due to MT or something
different.
but this argument is OT respect this thread.
Regards,
I solved part .. now try to summarize what I have done now with this
demo into lizmap Montpellier to print the PDF.
While the same operation done on my project generates me this error in the
log file of apache:
*[Wed Jun 11 00:34:15 2014] [warn] [client 127.0.0.1] mod_fcgid: error
reading
(sorry for OT, but I don't know how change subject in google web email client)
I tested it.
On QGIS 2.2. start but don't work correctly.
On QGIS 2.4 rc it simply fully lock the qgis.
I tested it on win7 64 bit (using qgis 32bit)
So we lan to fund for resolve also again it after the qgis 2.4
There is available a qgis-server for some online test ?
2014-06-11 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jürgen E. j...@norbit.de:
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 11. Jun 2014 at 08:39:11 +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
It is true that in some cases we need to improve to be more standards
compliant. This is a group effort.
Hello
I developed a WebGIS with lizmap 2.10 but I have a problem with the print
button is Lizmap with version 2.8, 2.9 to 2.10, that is, when I click on
the print button I generate a pdf white. For me it works all the rest.
This problem is also present with the demo present by default in all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 10/06/2014 17:32, kimaidou ha scritto:
Hi Andrea,
This must be a QGIS Server error, as Lizmap only build the GetPrint url and
send it
to QGIS Server.
I think the GetPrint command couold be removed, sooner or later (maybe better
sooner,
see
Hi Paolo
I am quite confident the GetPrint command won't be removed. This is an
awesome feature.
To solve the standard getCapabilites issue, we should just pass the print
option info in the getProjectConfig request answer instead of the
getCapabilities answer, and it will be ok.
(I think we
Hi Michael
the log file does not exist any mistakes
what lizmap should print to pdf elements are shape-files displayed in
webgis lizmap and the default items in the print template present in the
project of qgis.
I also tried to create a simple model with only the element map, qgis from
the
Hello,
Le mardi 10 juin 2014 17:34:34, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
Il 10/06/2014 17:32, kimaidou ha scritto:
Hi Andrea,
This must be a QGIS Server error, as Lizmap only build the GetPrint url
and send it to QGIS Server.
I think the GetPrint command couold be removed, sooner or later
Il 10/06/2014 18:09, Vincent Picavet ha scritto:
We rely on this command for some applications, just removing it is not an
option for us right now.
People should stop thinking their use case is the only one and if they shout
louder their desiderata will be executed.
Talking about norms
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:38 AM, aperi2007 aperi2...@gmail.com wrote:
To response to you point of view:
I can only say that we
are fund some plugin.at 1.8 level.
With the break api of the 2.0 we must to refund the repair of plugins.
With the 2.2 the plugin stop again to work, and with the
15 matches
Mail list logo
