On 11 March 2013 00:54, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 03/10/2013 03:49 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:
On 10 March 2013 22:22, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 03/10/2013 03:13 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:
Hello,
The one major element missing from the
On 03/11/2013 12:18 AM, Lester Anderson wrote:
On 11 March 2013 00:54, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 03/10/2013 03:49 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:
On 10 March 2013 22:22, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 03/10/2013 03:13 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:
Hello,
Am 10.03.2013 23:49, schrieb Lester Anderson:
I have tried the route you suggested. I am working on Antarctic data, so
generated a vector grid for 0-360 in X (at 10 degrees) and latitude (-90 to
-60) in 10 degrees. That all worked fine in WGS84. However, reprojecting to
Antarctic
Hello,
The one major element missing from the otherwise great Quantum GIS, is that
of easy setup map graticules. There is a basic way of doing simple ones in
the print composer which is fine for geographic (WGS84) or UTM etc type
projections, but will not work for conic or stereographic etc.
Is
On 03/10/2013 03:13 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:
Hello,
The one major element missing from the otherwise great Quantum GIS, is that
of easy setup map graticules. There is a basic way of doing simple ones in
the print composer which is fine for geographic (WGS84) or UTM etc type
projections, but
On 10 March 2013 22:22, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
On 03/10/2013 03:13 PM, Lester Anderson wrote:
Hello,
The one major element missing from the otherwise great Quantum GIS, is
that
of easy setup map graticules. There is a basic way of doing simple ones in
the print
