Hello Andras, all,
Le jeudi 3 juillet 2014 15:18:19, Andreas Neumann a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I think a mention of the organization who funded a feature in the visual
> changelog is a reasonable request. Not much work and a fair recognition
> and "thank you" visible by many.
I think this can be a
Fair comments from both Andreas and Jurgen (below).
I was merely trying to see if we should also be looking after the
efforts of the quiet self funded developer in the back room.
Regards,
Zoltan
On 2014/07/04 09:48, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
On Fri, 04. Jul 2014 at 09:07:12 +0200
Hi Zoltan,
On Fri, 04. Jul 2014 at 09:07:12 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote:
> Whilst recognising the immense importance of financial funding, surely there
> are quite a few developers out there that have added to Open Source by
> giving their own time without receiving any remuneration whatsoever.
Hi Zoltan,
I believe the developers, contributors and translators get their
recognition already. Their names are listed in the about box of our
software. In addition you can read their names on github.
I would not list number of source code lines or number of commits,
because this is meaningless.
Hi,
I've been following this thread with great interest.
Whilst recognising the immense importance of financial funding, surely
there are quite a few developers out there that have added to Open
Source by giving their own time without receiving any remuneration
whatsoever.
I accept that it w
On 03/07/2014 11:18 pm, "Andreas Neumann" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think a mention of the organization who funded a feature in the visual
> changelog is a reasonable request. Not much work and a fair recognition
> and "thank you" visible by many.
>
> In the visual changelog you also list the spons
Hello all,
I feel that we would have the exact same problem in Portugal. Public
entities will not be able to donate, because they must justify the spent
money with some direct need.
On the other hand, to convince a decision maker or politician that
investing in QGIS is (also) good for their image
Add 'made-with-european-fund.shp' in the name of the shapefile :))
> Le 3 juillet 2014 à 16:58, Andrea Peri a écrit :
>
>
> Yes, I confirm this heavy constraint.
>
> Every develope with european fund ask to have a logo in it.
>
> More complex then this is when with the european fund you do a GIS
Yes, I confirm this heavy constraint.
Every develope with european fund ask to have a logo in it.
More complex then this is when with the european fund you do a GIS archive.
The european officers think only to a map as a pdf or as an image so
they guess seem easy to put a logo on it.
But if the
right!
Tata Livreri
Il 03/07/2014 14:37, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
Il 03/07/2014 14:29, n.roch...@aduga.org ha scritto:
Sear Paolo
I think, social network is a good way, politician are using it a lot.
The oher way should put the name and logo of the agency/business wich fund
*entirely*
a
Ask more for have 50% of the request :-)
Its not necessary but carefull if you order a improvment with Europe's fund, you
must display the logo (it was our experience with the QGIS plugin "cadastre")
Nicolas
> Le 3 juillet 2014 à 15:26, Andreas Neumann a écrit :
>
>
> In the visual changelog I
In the visual changelog I wouldn't propose to include logos of funding
organizations. Just the name and the link to the organization.
Andreas
Am 03.07.2014 13:18, schrieb Andreas Neumann:
> Hi all,
>
> I think a mention of the organization who funded a feature in the visual
> changelog is a reas
Hi all,
I think a mention of the organization who funded a feature in the visual
changelog is a reasonable request. Not much work and a fair recognition
and "thank you" visible by many.
In the visual changelog you also list the sponsors at the very top - so
why not also mentioning the funding org
Selon Paolo Cavallini :
> Il 03/07/2014 14:29, n.roch...@aduga.org ha scritto:
> > Sear Paolo
> >
> > I think, social network is a good way, politician are using it a lot.
> > The oher way should put the name and logo of the agency/business wich fund
> *entirely*
> > a new feature on the graphic c
I didn't think bad with my request and that ou explain is right.I didn't assess
pernicious effects that my request will do.
My request is to be sure to justifiy the work it has done by professional with
fund I can have from our partner and try to stimulate opensource instead of
seeing local agency
I agree with Paolo.
A phrase like
"totally fund" to a feature mean that none other other subject is
allowed to fund for any evolution on it.
Because that feture it totally charge on that PA.
But also should be possibile to allow an history of a feature.
So if a PA has fund for the first creation
Il 03/07/2014 14:29, n.roch...@aduga.org ha scritto:
> Sear Paolo
>
> I think, social network is a good way, politician are using it a lot.
> The oher way should put the name and logo of the agency/business wich fund
> *entirely*
> a new feature on the graphic changelog
> (http://changelog.linfi
Sear Paolo
I think, social network is a good way, politician are using it a lot.
The oher way should put the name and logo of the agency/business wich fund
entirely a new feature on the graphic changelog
(http://changelog.linfiniti.com/qgis/version/2.4.0/)
Thanks for your quick reply
Nicolas
>
Il 03/07/2014 12:20, n.roch...@aduga.org ha scritto:
> I've started discussion with Anita Graser on Twitter for that. She explained
> to me
> that I paid for a special features and I will not display because I do note
> give
> money directly to QGIS project.
> If you don't display there action,
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to explain that problem with no recognition of other private funding.
I beleive in QGIS but i have no skill for coding. So I try to use my job tilte
for find some fund for improve QGIS.
I've started discussion with Anita Graser on Twitter for that. She explained to
me that
Hi,
my personal point of view on this question.
I spent a lot of my personal time on qgis.
Of course I work for a Public Administration and we had spent some fund on qgis.
Not only qgis, but also geos, postgis, spatialite, gdal.
More or less on every of them.
The problem for us is to have a trac
Il 02/07/2014 17:18, Vincent Picavet ha scritto:
> I want to raise an important topic to fellow QGIS users, developers and...
> funders ! It is clear from the release process debate, that one of the thing
> we need, is more funders.
> This is communication, but improving the general feedback to
Start a page on Wikipedia:
"List Of Companies That Fund Open Source Software Projects"
and list QGIS. Then invite other projects to add their sponsors to the
list. Once established a page like this will be contributed to and
maintained by users around the world.
Hello,
I want to raise an imp
Hello,
I want to raise an important topic to fellow QGIS users, developers and...
funders ! It is clear from the release process debate, that one of the thing
we need, is more funders.
I regularly hear from potential QGIS funders sentences like "We would like to
be recognized as a funder for t
24 matches
Mail list logo
