You're right. I was right thinking about it yesterday while committing the
changes.
*f *is misleading, and it should be substituded by *rf* in my formula.
Thanks for having reported your measurements. They helped a lot to figure
out the bug ;)
giovanni
2012/4/6 blavet
> **
> *Good evening*
>
>
I will read your post with more attention tomorrow.
Anyway, the code is correct now, because my patch was included this morning
:)
giovanni
2012/4/6 blavet
> **
> *Good evening*
>
> Of course thank you again i fully agree with what you found which is
> mathematically correct ,
> it was not eas
Good evening
Of course thank you again i fully agree with what you found which is
mathematically correct ,
it was not easy to find, and is essential for debugging the
calculation of ellipsoîdal distances
I just had a quick look at the code found at
http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/browser/trunk/qg
