Ah k, I see its usefulness now! Was recently styling a roads datasets with
a couple dozen categories. Definitely helped identify ones I needed to
include in some grouping or rule.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019, 01:01 Richard Duivenvoorde,
wrote:
> On 23/02/2019 07.05, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> > It's a ca
On 23/02/2019 07.05, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> It's a catch all for eventual missing data. These will disappear from
> the map if you remove it
Yes, I often give it a very big red dot or line, so to show me I miss
rules or categories in my styling. It is easy to hide it.
Richard
__
It's a catch all for eventual missing data. These will disappear from the map
if you remove it
Cheers.
Il 23 febbraio 2019 02:01:28 CET, Lachlan McConnell ha
scritto:
>Good question, Donovan. After not figuring that out for awhile I just
>click off.
>
>On 23 February 2019 04:44:12 GMT+08:00,
Good question, Donovan. After not figuring that out for awhile I just click
off.
On 23 February 2019 04:44:12 GMT+08:00, Saulteau Don
wrote:
Afternoon everyone!
I've always been curious why, when styling a vector layer using
categories,
there's an entry at the bottom of the list that is alway
Afternoon everyone!
I've always been curious why, when styling a vector layer using categories,
there's an entry at the bottom of the list that is always empty with 0
features.
In 3.6 it comes in with the value "all other features".
Does it serve some purpose that I'm missing?
I often just remov
