"Johannes Kröger (WhereGroup) via Qgis-user"
writes:
> Am 31.07.22 um 18:11 schrieb Mike Stanton via Qgis-user:
>>
>> It all depends on the module you are running and whether it
>> effectively uses the “-multi” option with “all_available_cores” and
>> of course how many cores are available on
Am 31.07.22 um 18:11 schrieb Mike Stanton via Qgis-user:
It all depends on the module you are running and whether it
effectively uses the “-multi” option with “all_available_cores” and of
course how many cores are available on your system.
I think there is some confusion here. Greg, can you
Troxel ; chris hermansen
Cc: qgis-user
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] excessive threads?
On 7/30/2022 6:36 PM, Greg Troxel via Qgis-user wrote:
I do understand that threads could help parallelization, eitehr using
multiple cores, or just allowing IO in parallel.
chris hermansen <mailto:clher
On 7/30/2022 6:36 PM, Greg Troxel via
Qgis-user wrote:
I do understand that threads could help parallelization, eitehr using
multiple cores, or just allowing IO in parallel.
chris hermansen writes:
Does it seem like you have one
I do understand that threads could help parallelization, eitehr using
multiple cores, or just allowing IO in parallel.
chris hermansen writes:
> Does it seem like you have one thread per layer for reading plus one for
> rendering plus one for user input?
I don't know how many layers I have
another tool that uses the GDAL Library for
processing and it does get up over 140 threads when it is doing it processing
From: chris hermansen
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2022 3:57 PM
To: Mike Stanton
Cc: Greg Troxel ; qgis-user
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] excessive threads?
Mike and list,
Mike, would
gt; *From:* Qgis-user * On Behalf Of *chris
> hermansen via Qgis-user
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 30, 2022 2:37 PM
> *To:* Greg Troxel
> *Cc:* qgis-user
> *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] excessive threads?
>
>
>
> Greg and list
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 10:38 AM Gr
: qgis-user
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] excessive threads?
Greg and list
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 10:38 AM Greg Troxel via Qgis-user
mailto:qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>> wrote:
(I realize excessive is relative. Back when I was young, we didn't have
any threads at all)
My desktop is NetBS
Greg and list
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 10:38 AM Greg Troxel via Qgis-user <
qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
> (I realize excessive is relative. Back when I was young, we didn't have
> any threads at all)
>
> My desktop is NetBSD 9, I ran out of threads, and found that qgis 3.22.8
> was
an execution event (I/O or Hard Page Fault) to trigger it.
-Original Message-
From: Qgis-user On Behalf Of Greg Troxel
via Qgis-user
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2022 12:38 PM
To: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [Qgis-user] excessive threads?
(I realize excessive is relative. Back when I was young
(I realize excessive is relative. Back when I was young, we didn't have
any threads at all)
My desktop is NetBSD 9, I ran out of threads, and found that qgis 3.22.8
was using 157 threads, much more than I expected.
Yes, I know 157 is not a super large number, and that the limit of 1024
11 matches
Mail list logo
