On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le mercredi 13 avril 2016 20:05:27, Paulo van Breugel a écrit :
> > I just opened a raster layer (asci layer), with real numbers with 6
> > decimals.
> >
> > When click with the 'Identify Features' tool on a raster cell it shows
> many
> > mo
Hi,
My guess is that 83.320587 can't be represented using a base 2 number.
Qgis is showing you the closest match. Computer work with base 2 and we
normally think in terms of base 10.
Nicolas
On Apr 13, 2016 13:51, "pvanbosgeo [via OSGeo.org]"
wrote:
Le mercredi 13 avril 2016 20:05:27, Paulo van Breugel a écrit :
> I just opened a raster layer (asci layer), with real numbers with 6
> decimals.
>
> When click with the 'Identify Features' tool on a raster cell it shows many
> more decimals, e.g., 83.32058715820312 for a raster cell that has valu
I just opened a raster layer (asci layer), with real numbers with 6
decimals.
When click with the 'Identify Features' tool on a raster cell it shows many
more decimals, e.g., 83.32058715820312 for a raster cell that has value
83.320587 (as can be easily checked by opening the layer as text file).