It is also my experience that 1.0.x and 1.1.x have a comparable level of stability.
Regards, Marco -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org im Auftrag von Paolo Cavallini Gesendet: Di 14.07.2009 17:42 An: qgis-user Betreff: Re: [Qgis-user] Poll on website Andreas Neumann ha scritto: > I think that this is due to the fact that QGIS is still a relatively young > project and a lot of functionality is still missing. For this reason > people trade the benefit of having the urgently needed feature against the > fact that the unstable version may not be as stable. Yes, this is also my experience. Furthermore, I do not find 1.0.x particularly more stable than 1.1.x (do you?). All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user