[ql-developers] 2GHz 68060

2003-12-17 Thread Peter Graf
Thierry wrote: BTW, who could we bribe, at Motorola, so that they relaunch the 68060 production with modern technology ?... I'm still dreaming about a 2GHz 68060... I bet it would not be ridiculous at all when compared to Intel/AMD's over-complicated and bloated processors... The man is probably J

Re: [ql-developers] 2GHz 68060

2003-12-17 Thread Thierry Godefroy
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:03:21 +0100, Peter Graf wrote: > You might run 8 in parallel (not that I'd design the board :) Aww common !... ;-) Thierry.

[ql-developers] HD max size (was: Re: Linux Q40 Update)

2003-12-17 Thread Thierry Godefroy
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:37:44 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > !!! WARNING !!! Kernel 2.4.18 (probably anything <2.4.21) > will eat filesystems on disks>137GB. Read in Documentation/ide.txt of the Linux kernel sources: == How To Use *Big* ATA/IDE drives with Linux

Fw: Re: [ql-developers] 2GHz 68060

2003-12-17 Thread Thierry Godefroy
Erf... I meant 'come on', of course... --- Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:56:37 +0100 From: Thierry Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-developers] 2GHz 68060 On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:03:21 +0100, Peter Graf

Re: [ql-developers] Linux Q40 Update

2003-12-17 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:19:47AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:37:44 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > a short roundup of issues I am messing with: > > > > !!! WARNING !!! Kernel 2.4.18 (probably anything <2.4.21) > > will eat filesystems on disks>1

Re: Fw: Re: [ql-developers] 2GHz 68060

2003-12-17 Thread pgraf
On 17 Dec 2003 at 11:17, Thierry Godefroy wrote: > > > Erf... I meant 'come on', of course... > > --- > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:56:37 +0100 > From: Thierry Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [q

Re: [ql-developers] HD max size (was: Re: Linux Q40 Update)

2003-12-17 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote: > All current day IDE drives are somewhat smaller than this upper limit, and > within a few years, ATAPI disk drives will raise the limit considerably. > == someone should update that text I guess ;) > I suppose your