Re: [ql-users] This list: Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce N
Dilwyn, QL-Developers is still alive although sporadic, for more info go to http://lists.q-v-d.com/listinfo.cgi/ql-developers-q-v-d.com -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday, February 28, 2007, 11:03:52 PM, you wrote: > Veery hard to understand the question since the header of each > mai

Re: [ql-users] This list: Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Veery hard to understand the question since the header of each mail contains :- >> >>> Ah but I never see the headers - so I didn't know that was there. >>> Mind >>> you I should have noticed the bit at the bottom >> >> Yes, most people have the option to view all the headers turned

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Tony Firshman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rich Mellor wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:14 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Rich Mellor wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Rich Mellor
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:14 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rich Mellor wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>

Re: [ql-users] This list: Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Tony Firshman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen wrote: > Tony Firshman wrote: >> Mozilla Thunderbird in fact does not include header viewing option - >> this has to be an extension. I tried with ql-users messages, and the >> header is so long, one cannot see the bottom of the header in less

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Tony Firshman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rich Mellor wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Malcolm Cadman wrote: >>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich >>> Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [ql-users] This list: Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Stephen
Tony Firshman wrote: > Mozilla Thunderbird in fact does not include header viewing option - > this has to be an extension. I tried with ql-users messages, and the > header is so long, one cannot see the bottom of the header in less than > 1024 vertical resolution. Then there is only a fraction of

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Rich Mellor
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:44:03 -, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Malcolm Cadman wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich >> Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >>> Yes I could do this, but I wanted to ensure that the code w

Re: [ql-users] This list: Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Tony Firshman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Malcolm Cadman wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roy wood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes > >>> Veery hard to understand the question since the header of each mail >>> contains :-

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Tony Firshman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Malcolm Cadman wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich > Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> Yes I could do this, but I wanted to ensure that the code would also work >> on a Gold Card for possible future projects - not just QWord. Still >>

Re: [ql-users] This list:  Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roy wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes >>Veery hard to understand the question since the header of each mail >>contains :- >Ah but I never see the headers - so I didn't know that was there. Mind >you I shou

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Yes I could do this, but I wanted to ensure that the code would also work >on a Gold Card for possible future projects - not just QWord. Still >no-one has still reported whether it works on a Gold Card+aurora or not >yet !!

Re: [ql-users] This list:  Subscribe

2007-02-28 Thread Roy wood
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes >Veery hard to understand the question since the header of each mail contains :- Ah but I never see the headers - so I didn't know that was there. Mind you I should have noticed the bit at the bottom >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >References:

Re: [ql-users] This list: Rrepeat postings

2007-02-28 Thread Roy wood
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rich Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >The link at the bottom of each email sent via the list goes to a page >where instructions are given :-) > >See: http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm Do you know - all these years and I never looked at that - damn! -- Roy Wo

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread Rich Mellor
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:58:15 -, Daniele Terdina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is there an easy way under QDOS to check which chip is in use - if it >> is a >> 68000 or 68008 I would use 2 (or 4) MOVE.B commands instead? SMSQ does >> implement the processor in the system variables, but it

Re: [ql-users] Checking on Processor

2007-02-28 Thread George Gwilt
On 27 Feb 2007, at 21:58, Rich Mellor wrote: > > Now this crashes on a 68008 chip but I am not concerned as QWord > needs a > Super Gold Card ideally to run. However, I wonder whether it works > on a > Gold Card (not tested) - has anyone experience running QWord on a Gold > Card, as the 6800