Re: [ql-users] Stupendipity!

2007-06-08 Thread Dave Walker
It would be normal for a router to have a different IP address on the downstream side to the upstream side with the upstream side being of the 192.168.0/1.x type of address for your local LAN and the gateway and DNS is then set to be the router. Normally the downstream side is then connected dire

Re: [ql-users] Stupendipity!

2007-06-08 Thread Norman
Morning Dave, > It would be normal for a router to have a different IP address on the > downstream side to the upstream side with the upstream side being of the > 192.168.0/1.x type of address for your local LAN and the gateway and DNS is > then set to be the router. Yep - I know that bit. Tha

Re: [ql-users] Stupendipity!

2007-06-08 Thread Dave Walker
Norman, Is the router you have designed for use with cable? If so it should have one downstream Ethernet port for connection to the cable modem and one or more upstream ones for your local equipment. Sounds as if you just might be trying to use an ADSL router incorrectly with the cable modem

Re: [ql-users] Stupendipity!

2007-06-08 Thread Norman
Hi Dave, > Is the router you have designed for use with cable? Nope. ADSL. (Both are !) I figured it might be that that was the cause of the problems, however, the bumff from Virgin makes no mention of needing a cable router They simply say to "plug the ethernet lead from the cable modem

Re: [ql-users] Stupendipity!

2007-06-08 Thread Tobias Fröschle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:Hi Dave, > >> Is the router you have designed for use with cable? >> > > Nope. ADSL. (Both are !) > > I figured it might be that that was the cause of the problems, however, the > bumff from Virgin makes no mention of needing a cable router They simply say >