Martyn wrote -
.. It's more than open to interpretation, but if you're
still interested, let me explain (it's a bit long winded, but then I
test software as part of my real job and get a bit fastidious about
it).
Write on Martyn, please..
And thanks.
John in Wales
Hi Derek,
Is QT a good platform, I used to dabble a little in Linux.
I like it, Dave Walker thinks it's a little harder to program that .net
- I have no idea as I don't program .net.
There are bots of QT that take a while to get your head around. It is,
in many places, less easy to figure out
Evening Dave,
QT might produce a portable result, but it is much harder to program.
Well, I like it but I have to admit to not programming in .net (any
language) so I can't really compare.
It's a wee bit harder than Borland C++ Builder, for instance, but I like
it. I have a couple of program
The Qt source download is about 375Mb (in compressed format), so that would
be an immense amount of code to port. Qt assumes a graphical UI, so there
would be a need to write a QL specific mapping to support this. It is also
written largely in C++, so there would probably have to be port of
While I am at it, is there any interest in one of the QL emulators
running
on the iPhone/iTouch? I have been thinking of looking at porting
one of
them for some time.
Dave
I've been asked a couple of times if any of the QL emulators can run
on such a system.
This would definitely open up a
I would love to have a QL-emulator on my iPhone!
The problem is, that Apple don´t allow applications, which are able to
run other code (like a QL emulator would do with QL programs). There
were huge problems with the C64 emulator, too. The authors had to
remove C64 Basic and the emulator
I have heard from a number of sources that Apple may be about to relax that
restriction.
Having said that you could always jailbreak the phone to run an emulator.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com
[mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Anton
