On 10/12/12 07:13, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>> I did - it's great, full of typical English muddle-and-make-do and
>> corporate
>> incompetence... with our heros working within (and usually against) the
>> system to produce the laptop that almost never was...
> Indeed, great article.
>
> I don't think I'
On 10/12/12 11:26, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Probably because your phone doesn't seem to generate the
"In-Reply-To:" header.
Thanks.That would most likely be the reason.
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Thorpe House
61 Richardshaw Lane
Pudsey
West Yorksh
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I wonder why, when I reply fro my phone, I seem to start a new thread,
> even thoigh I'm replying and not manually, starting a new thread.
Probably because your phone doesn't seem to generate the
"In-Reply-To:" header.
Marcel
___
I wonder why, when I reply fro my phone, I seem to start a new thread,
even thoigh I'm replying and not manually, starting a new thread.
Mildly irritating.
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered address:
Thorpe House
61 Richardshaw Lane
Pudsey
West Yorkshire
Unite
Computer Research Centrum, Ltd wrote, on 10/Dec/12 08:05 | Dec10:
I was looking at the Python 3.3.0 sourceswith a view to porting to the
QL with C68.
Will be porting of Perl instead Python easier and more appropriate for a QL
limited in its resources (speed, memory, ...)?
Perl was running quit
>I was looking at the Python 3.3.0 sourceswith a view to porting to the
>QL with C68.
Will be porting of Perl instead Python easier and more appropriate for a QL
limited in its resources (speed, memory, ...)? Perl was running quite well od
old 68k Macintoshes.
