Dear Norman,
not going into details here as I cannot change the qltoday website ...
Bruce took care of it but he was very busy for quite some months.
The MAJOR difference here compared to Quanta is that Bruce does it for
free, work and site hosting.
Current info can be found on my website
Yes, it's me!! I always read it why I do the layout. And of course, I
find it interesting and amusing ... and I somehow miss the times where I
had time to write machine-code.
I wonder if I could do it, over 10 years without practice.
So, reading the code refreshes my mind, as I still
On 10/01/13 11:33, Tony Firshman wrote:
It is great that this very good programming keeps being done, even if
only you and George understand (8-)#
Trust me, if it wasn't for George, I wouldn't understand it either! ;-)
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered
--
From: Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:40 AM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] QL Today Website
I know I'm complaining, but I'm trying to be constructive. There is plenty
of criticism of the
I concur, as well as any QL related articles, feedback positive or
otherwise gives atleast an indication of something that has prompted
people in to a response. Norman, I read your Black Hole article with
interest on the DVD collection last year and likewise there are articles
about machine code,
On 10 Jan 2013, at 12:29, Geoff Wicks wrote:
It is not just on your articles I would like feedback. There has been more
emphasis on hardware in the last couple of years. Is this what people want?
More recently we have had more coverage on games - a largely forgotten area
in the
