Stephen wrote:
> Beyond me I think!
Just today I got the recent issue of Germans c't magazine
which has Knoppix v6.1 (Debian Kernel 2.6.28.4) on a Live-DVD.
So, I did try to compile uqlx but it failed with similar problem
reports as at Stephen.
On Knoppix v3.4/v3.4 from 2003/2004 (the Live-CD I
On 06/03/09 18:27, Robert Newson wrote:
Stephen wrote:
...
Tried Peter's suggestion of deleting the earlier offending line which
appears to get me beyond the QL68000.h stage only to throw up several
hundred errors in "xqlkey.c".
Would those errors be along the lines of:
headers not found
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> Norman - try this for info:
> http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Thanks Dilwyn, I have subscribed.
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> That's because it is rarely used :)
> Address is: ql-develop...@q-v-d.com
> You subscribe just like you did with ql-users
Hi Phoebus, where ha
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Evening Peter,
>
> Peter wrote:
>
>
>> If you have further questions, try the ql-developers mailing list.
>>
>
>
> at the risk of sounding a little stupid, what ql-developers list do you
> refer to? I've never heard of it!
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Norman.
>
Tha
Evening Peter,
Peter wrote:
If you have further questions, try the ql-developers mailing list.
at the risk of sounding a little stupid, what ql-developers list do you
refer to? I've never heard of it!
Thanks.
Cheers,
Norman.
Norman - try this for info:
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.
On 05/03/09 12:47, Urs Koenig (QL issues) wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Any suggestions? (I am a Linux newbie!)
I use a later version of uqlx, release="10/22/02 16:10:00"
This has different definitions in terms of big_endian.
I'll post you this release with a private email.
No luck I'm afraid - s
Evening Peter,
Peter wrote:
> If you have further questions, try the ql-developers mailing list.
at the risk of sounding a little stupid, what ql-developers list do you
refer to? I've never heard of it!
Thanks.
Cheers,
Norman.
___
QL-Users Mailing
Hi Stephen,
I didn't have a closer look, but your problem might just be that your C
compiler does more strict checking than the ones that were used back when
the sources were released. Try removing line 470 from QL68000.h.
If you have further questions, try the ql-developers mailing list.
Bye,
Stephen wrote:
> Any suggestions? (I am a Linux newbie!)
I use a later version of uqlx, release="10/22/02 16:10:00"
This has different definitions in terms of big_endian.
I'll post you this release with a private email.
Best regards, Urs
___
QL-Use
Attempting to compile UQLX from
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Bay/2602/uqlx_tar_bz2.zip
in Linux Mint I get the following error:
---
QL68000.h:694: error: static declaration of ‘big_endian’ follows
non-static declaration
Q
10 matches
Mail list logo
