Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-05 Thread Lee Privett
As a deputy, I am grateful... On 3 May 2012, at 23:02, Malcolm Cadman wrote: > In message <4fa22264.9010...@dunbar-it.co.uk>, Norman Dunbar > writes >> On 02/05/12 22:14, Malcolm Cadman wrote: >> >>> As the great Bob (Marley) sang ... no WMAN no cry . :-) >> >> And we all know how Bob

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-04 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <4fa22264.9010...@dunbar-it.co.uk>, Norman Dunbar writes On 02/05/12 22:14, Malcolm Cadman wrote: As the great Bob (Marley) sang ... no WMAN no cry . :-) And we all know how Bob Marley likes his donuts? We Jammin. (You started it!) Cheers, Norm. 'Cos I knew you would appr

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 02/05/12 22:14, Malcolm Cadman wrote: As the great Bob (Marley) sang ... no WMAN no cry . :-) And we all know how Bob Marley likes his donuts? We Jammin. (You started it!) Cheers, Norm. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: Thorpe House 61 Richardshaw Lane

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <4fa10f60.5070...@dunbar-it.co.uk>, Norman Dunbar writes Hi Norman, As the great Bob (Marley) sang ... no WMAN no cry . :-) On 02/05/12 11:35, George Gwilt wrote: The status area is $40 bytes long so that the loose item status block starts at wst + $40. Thanks George, that

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread Billy
On 02/05/2012 10:55, Norman Dunbar wrote: On 02/05/12 09:55, Norman Dunbar wrote: It seems that SETW, not the latest version, defines a WORD for the window flag byte and the shadow depth byte. When I typed the above, what I was meaning to say was that SETW combines the two bytes (flag and shado

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 02/05/12 11:35, George Gwilt wrote: The status area is $40 bytes long so that the loose item status block starts at wst + $40. Thanks George, that works perfectly. It appears that the offset into the definition's status area is exactly the same as for the working definition. This is good.

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread George Gwilt
On 2 May 2012, at 09:55, Norman Dunbar wrote: > > When setting up a window, how do I set a couple of the loose items to > unavailable? I know how to do it in the working definition after the window > has been set up, but I think I need to do it in the status area before I call > WM_SETUP? If

Re: [Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 02/05/12 09:55, Norman Dunbar wrote: It seems that SETW, not the latest version, defines a WORD for the window flag byte and the shadow depth byte. When I typed the above, what I was meaning to say was that SETW combines the two bytes (flag and shadow depth) into a single word, not that it g

[Ql-Users] WMAN Weirdness!

2012-05-02 Thread Norman Dunbar
I'm in the middle of my next (exciting) article for QL Today and I've come across something unusual in WMAN under QPC. But first a "simple" question. When setting up a window, how do I set a couple of the loose items to unavailable? I know how to do it in the working definition after the wind