Re: [Ql-Users] What would you most like to see in a new versionofQDOSMSQ?

Plastic wrote: Apologies for the off-topicness, but one thing I'd like to see from Turbo or other compilers is a command maker that can take a PROCedure or FuNction, compile it, and package it up so it can be loaded to extend BASIC. Works with QLib (and also Turbo, I think). With QLib, if

Re: [Ql-Users] What would you most like to see in a new versionofQDOSMSQ?

On 28 Jan 2011, at 12:10, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Plastic wrote: Apologies for the off-topicness, but one thing I'd like to see from Turbo or other compilers is a command maker that can take a PROCedure or FuNction, compile it, and package it up so it can be loaded to extend BASIC. Works