Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-05 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > does your comment mean the question is solved? Not sure if intentional or not, but OPEN_OVER with NFS device overwrites any file, even if it's marked as read-only. And according to François it returns "not found" if the file really is on a read-only drive like a CD-ROM,

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-05 Thread Wolf via Ql-Users
Hi, does your comment mean the question is solved? Wolfgang On 05/08/2018 10:31, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: Thank you for your explanation. Have a fine day, François Van Emelen ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-05 Thread François Van Emelen via Ql-Users
Op 5/08/2018 om 10:26 schreef Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: I didn't get the original question, for a few days I seem to have had some email trouble... This was the complete code: 100 OPEN_OVER#3,'ram2_rdonly_txt' 110  REMark Why does 'dmedium_rdonly(\dev$) return 0

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-05 Thread François Van Emelen via Ql-Users
I didn't get the original question, for a few days I seem to have had some email trouble... Wolfgang Hi Wolfgang, The original questuion was: Hi All, (if there is still someone listening, of course.) Can someone tell me why the return values in this small prog are different from those

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-05 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > I didn't get the original question, for a few days I seem to have had > some email trouble... This was the complete code: 100 OPEN_OVER#3,'ram2_rdonly_txt' 110  REMark Why does 'dmedium_rdonly(\dev$) return 0 instead of 1 120  REMark Why does 'dmedium_type(\dev$)

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-04 Thread Wolf via Ql-Users
Hi, I didn't get the original question, for a few days I seem to have had some email trouble... Wolfgang On 04/08/2018 18:01, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users wrote: On 03/08/18 12:01, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: Hi all, (if there is still someone listening, of course.) I'm

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-04 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: > 110  REMark Why does 'dmedium_rdonly(\dev$) return 0 instead of 1 > 120  REMark Why does 'dmedium_type(\dev$) return -1 instead of 3 Because I didn't implement special support for this. The DOS device generally doesn't care if the directory you point it

Re: [Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-04 Thread Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
On 03/08/18 12:01, François Van Emelen via Ql-Users wrote: Hi all, (if there is still someone listening, of course.) I'm listening, but unfortunately, I don't know the answer. Sorry. :( Cheers, Norm. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: 27a Lidget Hill Pudsey West

[Ql-Users] return values QPC2 <>SMSQMULATOR

2018-08-03 Thread François Van Emelen via Ql-Users
Hi all, (if there is still someone listening, of course.) Can someone tell me why the return values in this small prog are different from those found in the SMQS/E SBASIC/SuperBASIC Reference Manual Online Documentation Release 4.0.1 by Rich Mellor and why QPC2 and SMSQMULATOR sometimes return