RE: [ql-users] OT - OSARIS pocket computer

2001-02-05 Thread Norman Dunbar
Then, of course, Norman's 'Stripper' does the above job in a twinkle too :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) Norman Dunbar EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Database/Unix administrator Phone: 0113 289 6265

RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread Norman Dunbar
QPC2v2 is a great product, it just a pity that it is now mainly us more 'expert' QL users that are left to use it. I agree, but I'm not that much of an expert - so I just use it in the manner of a QL, to do what I want to do. Many of those who have abandoned the QL OS for the pleasures :-(

Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 4 Feb 2001, at 10:36, Peter Graf wrote: > Of course the QL is a platform. It is not true that the QL is restricted to > QDOS. I can run a different operating system on it, not only QDOS. The > interfaces to the hardware are defined and accessible. All right, then QPC must be a platform as

Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread Urs König
Although the 'QPC2v2 again' thread is getting a bit long, the discussion has been very interesting and shows that we need both an emulator and a native hardware way forward. The emulator scene is very well served at the moment. Let's hope that the future of Q40/Goldfire/any other SGC

Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Graf
Tony Firshman wrote: Do you get initial screen blanking, and then nothing (I wish TT did a splash screen!). Or better: A progress indicator while starting up. You probably miss the old QL way of a screen memory test you can *watch* :-) Describe exactly, because, like the QL, the various

Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: colorparam0100,0100,0100/param Erm, Wolfgang... ;-) QDOS. I can run a different operating system on it, not only QDOS. The interfaces to the hardware are defined and accessible. All right, then QPC

Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread Peter Graf
Marcel wrote: Anyway, let's call it a /QL compatible/ platform of it's own. How about/SMSQ only/ platform of it's MS Windows? :-) Still think interfaces that nobody can access don't make a platform. But surrounded by SMSQ-on-Windows users it looks like I must give up :-) Peter

Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-05 Thread P Witte
Peter Graf writes: Hm. If it smells like Bill Gate's feet, tastes a little like Pentium silicon and sometimes looks like coffee, I have my doubts that it is tea. (just joking) Look at it this way: If a Windows PC is a QL, then a Sun workstation is an Amiga, an AIX server is a gameboy, and