Nasta wrote:
>Also, let me give a small
>contribution to the developing hardware vs developing software debate:
>people who have never tried jumping through hoops while bending backwards
>in order to get the parts they need, at reasonable quantity and reasonable
>price, will only understand the n
Peter Graf wrote:
>
> Nasta wrote:
>
Snip
> In the QL scene we have got (in our own style) what the Atari has not.
> Maybe we have the fastest 68K computer there ever was. It is reality and it
> works. And now? Are we proud? Is there a lot of interest? A lot of noise?
> Not yet. I get some posit
Bill wrote:
>> Hard times for QL hard-ware these days.
>
>We hear you
>We sympathise
>We are very grateful
>We buy what we can
>We can't buy the stuff for the rest though.
Thank you very much, Bill! Folks like you are the ones who keep things
moving. I shall not forget your encouragement.
Peter
On 2/11/2001 at 1:49 PM Peter Graf wrote:
>On the Q40 I minimized the availability problems by restricting myself to
>components especially chosen for that reason. But I had a price to pay:
The
>chips are not cheap (because I use 4 of them) and so small that it was
>endless work to squeeze the lo
Hi all,
Just one of my occasional mails to encourage you all to come along !
We just had our February meeting today, address is always in the Quanta
magazine. Yet if you are not a Quanta member here are the details.
***
2.00p
