On 11 Nov 2001, at 16:06, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> At 08:07 ìì 11/11/2001 +0100, you wrote:
> >Why ever would you want to do that?
>
> First of all because it's possible :-)
Is your middle name Hillary?
> Second of all because many of the commands are imperative to what I am
> trying to
On 11 Nov 2001, at 16:04, Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
> 1. I remember Marcel saying something about the x87 code being added and
> there might be an incompatibility with my AMD
Hmm, I use it with 3 amds (2 athlons, 1 K6) and no problem.
> 2. The other one is maybe the DirectX in conjunction with
Hmmm,
it might sound a stupid question to some of you but... how do we add
TURBO_TK as a module to SMSQE.bin?
Phoebus
Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
>
> > And this is a shame, although I would agree the image on screen may not
> > benefit a great deal from the increased colours it would be nice to be
> > able to print out to a printer that can use 24 bit colour and I'm not
> > sure we can do this if we can't disp
> And this is a shame, although I would agree the image on screen may not
> benefit a great deal from the increased colours it would be nice to be
> able to print out to a printer that can use 24 bit colour and I'm not
> sure we can do this if we can't display them ( I'm not sure we can do
> this
> I disagree that 24bit colour precision is not necessary. Many file formats
> support that and it would be best if we could be "compatible". Not to
> mention ported applications ;-)
There has been extensive reseach about the number of colours man can see. If
I remeber correctly, 16 bits was enou
