On 3/18/02 at 9:14 AM Tony Firshman wrote:
>> a) 'Regular' memory is generally quite substantially faster
>> than screen memory
> Wasn't it 30%?
I forgot to answer this one - actually, it's closer to 50% when compared to
true no-wait-state RAM on a standard QL.
Things quickly get worse once an
> How does the second screen concept fit into all this?
> ... sorry if you said but there was a _lot_ of text (8-)#
It is not considered. However, this could easily be emulted by swapping the
save area for another one and setting all the changed flags.
Question is, whatfor? Which program needs thi
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 at 18:17:21, ZN wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>Joachim wrote:
>
>> As I already mentioned, I am willing to volunteer for the following
>> changes in SMSQ.
>>
>>- have all windows draw their contents in the save area
>>- background update of windows (same mechanism)
>
>Yes
Joachim wrote:
> As I already mentioned, I am willing to volunteer for the following
> changes in SMSQ.
>
>- have all windows draw their contents in the save area
>- background update of windows (same mechanism)
Ye! :-)
>In general I propose the following changes.
>- Application should not
As I already mentioned, I am willing to volunteer for the following changes
in SMSQ.
- have all windows draw their contents in the save area
- background update of windows (same mechanism)
In general I propose the following changes.
- Application should not draw onscreen, but in the save area. W
