Malcolm Cadman wrote:-
David Gilham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that this one is no longer valid for David Gilham.
When I next see him I will get him to mail you his current one.
The info on your mail was very interesting, thanks.
Malcolm Cadman
As far as I know, Dave's new email address is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman wrote:-
David Gilham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that this one is no longer valid for David Gilham.
When I next see him I will get him to mail you his current one.
The info on your mail was very interesting, thanks.
Malcolm
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 at 15:22:56, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Malcolm Cadman wrote:-
David Gilham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know that this one is no longer valid for David Gilham.
When I next see him I will get him to mail you his
Following the Trader emailshot the following are undeliverable.
Help on the correct emails would be appreciated.
I get very very few emails from people letting me know their addresses,
but the majority on my list have asked to be on it.
When people move house, it is an expensive hassle letting
At 09:09 ìì 20/2/2002 +, you wrote:
Paul Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know for a fact that Paul Holmgren's address is valid so probably
something is wrong with your smtp maybe?
Phoebus
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Following the Trader emailshot the following are undeliverable.
Help on the correct emails would be appreciated.
I get very very few emails from people letting me know their addresses,
but the majority on my list have asked to
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 at 16:25:05, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 09:09 ìì 20/2/2002 +, you wrote:
Paul Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know for a fact that Paul Holmgren's address is valid so probably
something is wrong with your smtp maybe?
POP (8-)#
I doubt it as about 270 haven't
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 at 21:49:11, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 at 16:25:05, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 09:09 ìì 20/2/2002 +, you wrote:
Paul Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know for a fact that Paul Holmgren's address is valid so probably
something is
At 09:49 ìì 20/2/2002 +, you wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 at 16:25:05, you wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 09:09 ìì 20/2/2002 +, you wrote:
Paul Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know for a fact that Paul Holmgren's address is valid so probably
something is wrong with your smtp
