[ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-08 Thread ZN
With the recent, and not so recent discussions on hardware vs emulators, I decided to update everyone on the status of GoldFire. Especially since my name was pointedly called :-) and I've gotten a few personal mails about it too. Well, folks (yeah, right, now I'm converting into a redneck) the new

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-11 Thread Peter Graf
Nasta wrote: >Also, let me give a small >contribution to the developing hardware vs developing software debate: >people who have never tried jumping through hoops while bending backwards >in order to get the parts they need, at reasonable quantity and reasonable >price, will only understand the n

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-11 Thread Bill Waugh
Peter Graf wrote: > > Nasta wrote: > Snip > In the QL scene we have got (in our own style) what the Atari has not. > Maybe we have the fastest 68K computer there ever was. It is reality and it > works. And now? Are we proud? Is there a lot of interest? A lot of noise? > Not yet. I get some posit

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-11 Thread Peter Graf
Bill wrote: >> Hard times for QL hard-ware these days. > >We hear you >We sympathise >We are very grateful >We buy what we can >We can't buy the stuff for the rest though. Thank you very much, Bill! Folks like you are the ones who keep things moving. I shall not forget your encouragement. Peter

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-11 Thread ZN
On 2/11/2001 at 1:49 PM Peter Graf wrote: >On the Q40 I minimized the availability problems by restricting myself to >components especially chosen for that reason. But I had a price to pay: The >chips are not cheap (because I use 4 of them) and so small that it was >endless work to squeeze the lo

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-12 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 11 Feb 2001, at 13:49, Peter Graf wrote: > In the QL scene we have got (in our own style) what the Atari has not. > Maybe we have the fastest 68K computer there ever was. It is reality and it > works. And now? Are we proud? Is there a lot of interest? A lot of noise? > Not yet. I get some pos

RE: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-12 Thread Claude Mourier 00
And so I (as I can't get hand on Q40) -Message d'origine- De : Wolfgang Lenerz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : lundi 12 février 2001 15:28 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire? On 11 Feb 2001, at 13:49, Peter Graf wrote: > In th

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-13 Thread Arnould Nazarian
: In the QL scene we have got (in our own style) what the Atari has not. : Maybe we have the fastest 68K computer there ever was. It is reality and it : works. And now? Are we proud? Is there a lot of interest? A lot of noise? : Not yet. I get some positive response, but I also hear voices like: "

Re: [ql-users] Wherefor art thou, GoldFire?

2001-02-13 Thread Peter Graf
Arnould wrote: >OK, I want a Q60. A lot of encouragement from France! 500% more than from Germany :-) Thanks a lot, folks. I'll do my best, but it also depends on problems I can't solve on my own. Anyway response is always helpful, because I need to estimate if the number of Q60 requests can al