Re: [ql-users] spamcop.net

2002-04-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Not sure whether the message was blocked by the bank's server or the list server. > > Anyone else seen anything like this? Well, messages from my SMTP server just get ignored completely because of one of those blacklists (a different one, relays.osirusoft.com). It's qu

RE: [ql-users] spamcop.net

2002-04-24 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 11:03 ðì 24/4/2002, Ian wrote: > >Yeah and that's why: > >http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=139.149.1.38%3E > > > >Phoebus >Well, if that was an explanation of why I was blocked (and I suppose it >would be for network gurus) it goes way over my head. How come it just >picked one m

RE: [ql-users] spamcop.net

2002-04-24 Thread Ian . Pine
random to block? Ian. >-Original Message- >From: Phoebus Dokos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 24 April 2002 15:22 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [ql-users] spamcop.net > > >At 10:09 ðì 24/4/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>I tried se

Re: [ql-users] spamcop.net

2002-04-24 Thread Phoebus Dokos
At 10:09 ðì 24/4/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I tried sending a message to the list earlier, and got this back: > >Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. > > Subject: RE: [ql-users] QXLWIN v1.06 and partitions > Sent: 24/04/02 13:45 > >The following

[ql-users] spamcop.net

2002-04-24 Thread Ian . Pine
I tried sending a message to the list earlier, and got this back: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: [ql-users] QXLWIN v1.06 and partitions Sent: 24/04/02 13:45 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED