On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 at 18:30:50, Timothy Swenson wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I kind of jumped in the middle of this thread before I really read any
of the messages, so I'm sort of guessing a bit about the on going
conversation. I'm assuming that part of the discussion is about the
lack
Darren,
www.jms1.supanet.com is the John Sadler SQLUG website where George
puts his offerings.
Haven't been there recently to know if he's put it up yet.
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html
Joachim van der Auwera
wrote:
Ok, what if TT can not be
reached or found (or
worse) ? Or he has no time
or does not know anybody
fit for the job...
What if the amount of code
added is such that he is a
co-author, and not the
main author?
How can you expect people
to write free code
Software in the QL community has a much longer life than the
Windows
world, where using a program 2 years out-of-date is considered a
sin.
In my experience, the PC scene changes so radically in 2 years (not
always for the better) that software stands little chance of still
working 2 years on.
A few weeks ago, someone asked me if I had a copy of a manual for a
Di-Ren keyboard interface. At the time I didn't, but thanks to a nice
kind person who emailed me a scanned copy, I now have a manual as a
plain text, Quill DOC or Word DOC file. Trouble is...I've forgotten
who it was! If you are
Well said, Wolfgang, applause.
Back from a very nice QL show in the USA, a few words from me:
First of all, I'd say: leave the license as it is now else
you will never get a result.
You have asked for opinions and you have, in my opinion, adjusted
the license so that it should suit most
Richard wrote:
--
Why Wolfgang doesn't take GPL is beyond me. This license has
not onlytheoretical problems and Wolfgang is assuming much
more responsibility than he seems to want.
--
True - the responsibility is higher than I thought initially. However, if
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] FastFind
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 at 23:22:38, P Witte wrote:
(ref: 00bb01c210cd$94475c80$0100a8c0@gamma)
Tony Firshman writes,
Thanks
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
Richard wrote:
I will NEVER agree to GPL. Under GPL, as soon as you use the
tiniest little bit of something GPL'd, you HAVE to make your
code GPL, too.
you have obviously not even looked at GPL but only read some anti-GPL
fud
In a message dated 11/06/02 11:49:49 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A few weeks ago, someone asked me if I had a copy of a manual for a
Di-Ren keyboard interface. At the time I didn't, but thanks to a nice
kind person who emailed me a scanned copy, I now have a manual as a
plain
Jochen Merz wrote:
It is impossible to please anybody anyway, and I think you
have worked out a good compromise.
As far as Q60 is concerned, all compromise proposals were turned down.
Not only mine. Also those from well-known impartial persons.
Of course, if there's somebody who ONLY wants it
Hi Norman,
fantastic, this is what I suspected but could not prove it without
buying a camera and reading the docs. Obviously I have been on the
Kodak web site going round in circles for this info, all the attention
is on various cameras, which is correct but I didn't quite find enough
about
At 05:09 PM 6/11/2002 +0100, you wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
Richard wrote:
I will NEVER agree to GPL. Under GPL, as soon as you use the
tiniest little bit of something GPL'd, you HAVE to make your
code GPL, too.
Hmmm?
My understanding, as an open source
13 matches
Mail list logo
