Hello Everybody!
I am SO tired of that endless piracy discussion. The only highlight of the
last days was the nice story of that old lady which Tony told. But that is
just one drop of normality in an endless ocean of rubbish. This is my
advice to the involved parties:
get your duel pistons out, i
> Thanks for the info. Now how do I then replace the unpleasant beep in XP
> with the pleasant beep in 98?
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
by re-installing Windoze 98?
(please forgive me ... the temptation was too strong)
Sorry folks!
one second after I pressed the "send" button I realised I wrongly stated:
> Computers get only cheap, as they sell in millions
This is definitely not true, as all of us know. They also get cheap (sooner
or later) if they do not sell at all. Please do not get me wrong: I really
do n
Hello everyone out there!
I must admit I could hardly have expressed my very own opinion better than
Stephen did .
Let me guess ... if someone started developing a complete SMS/Q compatible
hardware system from scratch, they would end up with a system and a price
close to the Q60 machine. I am
Tony Firshman wrote:
> Sorry - must have missed it.
> It is there now:
> * *** *** 6.00.2600. (this line was censored)
Oh no!!! What did you do Tony! You spelled THE NAME. Probably something
teribble will happen - an earthquake, a release of a new piece of M$oftware
or th
Tony Firshman wrote:
> Interestingly whatever mailer you use does not identify itself in the
> header, so I guess it cannot be 'that which shall not be named' (8-)#
Now that is funny ... in fact it is. Looks like the program behaves the same
as we do.
Giorgio,
It was really not my intention to be offending - that was just a joke. I
understand from your reaction that it was not a good one. So
please accept my apologies.
Greetings
Michael
> Mr Bergen, antivirus are a good solution for the virus problem but
> is there any solution for your id
>even INHEAR is not mean enough to open attachements automatically - the
user
>has to add the final piece of stupidity - by clicking on the attachement.
>So (at least from my understanding) it would be unfair to complain about a
>no-cost software that is dangerous to the dull ones - but that
You REALLY made me laugh with your reply - that is a good thing, even if
nothing else is, honestly!
ok - I must admit I am a user of the program which is obviously fobidden to
be named in this newsgroup ... the evil 'WhatEverLook'.
The software "not for the classes but for the masses" (did'nt
what do you mean ATTACHMENT ???
something that has
>
or
>>
or even
>>>
in front of it ???
and who the hell is Giorgio - is this the waiter from the italian restaurant
next corner (I have ever been suspicious that he is a member of the mafia
...)
- Original Message -
From: "Öïßâïò Ñ. Í
10 matches
Mail list logo
