Bill Cable wrote:
I would also be willing to chip in some $$ also and it could possibly
work in one of 2 ways. Either buy the rights to put SMSQ/E under the GPL
or pay Peter to release his work under GPL for QDOS Classic or Minerva.
This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not
Hi,
a short visit to this list, since I've been asked for a comment on a
similar subject.
As some of you know, I'm working on a software that has the realistic
potential to provide
- Native ethernet for Q40/Q60
- Driver for Nasta's unfinished ethernet extension (QL/GC/SGC...)
- Native
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This lack of common ground seems to stem from the fact that you prefer
to profit from
developments made for other systems (eg. Marcel's new wman etc) and not
chip in
anything of your own.
I never used any version of SMSQ/E after those from Tony Tebby, so
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Well, Peter sells hardware, of course he wouldn't mind the software
being totally free.
I never asked for SMSQ/E to be free of charge for me, or to indirectly
reduce overall Q60 costs, as you seem to allude. As a matter of fact, I
had offered compensation for Tony Tebby
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Oh, excuse-me, but I'm only using (and developping it too) on Q40.
I won't call that a waste!
Of course not. It's not Jochen who actually suggested that NO Qx0 user
uses the new SMSQ/E. If that was the case, we could really have saved
a lot
