- Original Message -
From: "Tony Firshman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] a small but perfectly formed update to QDOS
INTERNALS website
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 08:57:21, wrote:
(ref:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 at 08:57:21, wrote:
(ref: <3DC63671.8337.69C9FB@localhost>)
>
>On 25 Oct 2002, at 23:58, Tony Firshman wrote:
>
>>
>> How about someone being appointed as a name server.
>> Anyone adding to QDOS/SMSQ for general release should register the name
>> with one person.
>
>Well, Fr
On 25 Oct 2002, at 23:58, Tony Firshman wrote:
>
> How about someone being appointed as a name server.
> Anyone adding to QDOS/SMSQ for general release should register the name
> with one person.
Well, François van Emelem is IT!!!
Wolfgang
In a message dated 25/10/02 17:12:18 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have thought about this, and here's how I would solve the problem.
Just make it a standard that a toolkit looks for an existing instance
of the keyword, and if it is in use, alter the keyword in a standardised
wa
Dave Walker writes:
> What is needed is some way to load toolkits "locally" to a particular
> instance of SBasic rather than as system wide global settings. As to
> whether anyone could think of a way to enhance SBasic to achieve this is
> another matter.
You already have it! In SMSQ/E, any ext
Dave P writes:
<>
> Just make it a standard that a toolkit looks for an existing instance
> of the keyword, and if it is in use, alter the keyword in a standardised
> way.
<>
Bit of a pain that if what all you wanted to do was to redefine a keyword -
a common occurance during toolkit developmen
François Van Emelen wrote:
>> Easy: just lrespr it within the particular SBASIC instance. The
> This isn't a solution for the 'words clashes', I'm afraid.
Of course. I didn't say it is.
Marcel
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 at 13:54:45, François Van Emelen wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>Speaking of Sbasic... Wouldn't it be nice to avoid 'word clashes' by
>following some kind of convention?
>An example to illustrate this?
>I've just discovered W. Lenerz' ARRAY_BIN. Nice extension, but
>unus
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Dave Walker wrote:
What is needed is some way to load toolkits "locally" to a particular
instance of SBasic rather than as system wide global settings. As to
whether anyone could think of a way to enhance SBasic to achieve this is
another matter.
Easy: just lrespr it w
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] a small but perfectly formed update to QDOS
>INTERNALS website
>
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Dave Walker wrote:
>
>> What is needed is some way to load toolkits "locally" to a particular
>> instance of SBasic rather than a
Dave P wrote:
> Just make it a standard that a toolkit looks for an existing instance
> of the keyword, and if it is in use, alter the keyword in a standardised
> way.
This would result in a complete mess. The semantic of a keyword
depending on the order in which the extensions are loaded, no tha
François Van Emelen wrote:
> What I'd like to see, from time to time on the list, is a progress
> report (progress?) about SMSQE. What has already been done, what will be
> added, updated, when can we expect a new version,
There are some plans for improving GD2 and some other minor things are
ha
Dave Walker wrote:
> What is needed is some way to load toolkits "locally" to a particular
> instance of SBasic rather than as system wide global settings. As to
> whether anyone could think of a way to enhance SBasic to achieve this is
> another matter.
Easy: just lrespr it within the particula
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] a small but perfectly formed update to QDOS
INTERNALS website
>Speaking of Sbasic... Wouldn't it be nice to avoid 'word clashes' by
>following some kind of convention?
Int
official keyword list to avoid conflicts.
Claude
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:phoebus@;dokos-gr.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 25 octobre 2002 16:05
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: RE: [ql-users] a small but perfectly formed update to QDOS
INTERNALS website
??? 25/10/2
??? 25/10/2002 9:34:47 ??, ?/? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
>
>>Speaking of Sbasic... Wouldn't it be nice to avoid 'word clashes' by
>>following some kind of convention?
>
>Interesting. I've been thinking about the same thing recently. And not just confined
>to clashing toolkits. By extending
S
ncept of SMSQ/E and SBASIC.
Ian
>-Original Message-
>From: François Van Emelen [mailto:francois.vanemelen@;chello.be]
>Sent: 25 October 2002 12:55
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ql-users] a small but perfectly formed update to QDOS
>INTERNALS website
>Spe
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
On 24 Oct 2002, at 14:20, Norman Dunbar wrote:
PS. Well, it has been quite here over the last couple of days - is anybody
out there ?
I think the usual answer is :no, there isn't...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
Wrong, I am. But there isn't much goi
isk with a
>single QWA partition on it, which physical sector would that
>information be found in?
>
>the very first sector.
>wolfgang
>-Original Message-
>From: Wolfgang Lenerz [mailto:wlenerz@;free.fr]
>Sent: 24 October 2002 20:38
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ian Pine writes:
<>
>Just looking at the hard disk details. On a disk with a
>single QWA partition on it, which physical sector would that
>information be found in?
The QWA file system normaly has its Primary Partition Table at sector 0. To
check:
open#3; "win1_*d2d"
get#3\0; sec$: close#3
pri
On 24 Oct 2002, at 14:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Must send my SMSQ source CD back to Wolfgang so I can get >the updated one.
I'm ready...
> Wondering whether Jochen is about. I emailed him about the Qmake disk I bought at
>the Byfleet show but have not had a reply.
I'm pretty sure th
On 24 Oct 2002, at 14:20, Norman Dunbar wrote:
> PS. Well, it has been quite here over the last couple of days - is anybody
> out there ?
I think the usual answer is :no, there isn't...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
Ian,
thanks for pointing out my URL error, you are quite correct it should be :
http://www.bountiful.demon.co.uk/qdos/index.html
As to where the hard disc information lives - I believe it is usually on the
very first sector of the disc (same as floppy) which, for the life of me, I
cannot rememb
mailto:Norman.Dunbar@;lfs.co.uk]
>Sent: 24 October 2002 14:20
>To: QL (E-mail)
>Cc: QL (E-mail)
>Subject: [ql-users] a small but perfectly formed update to QDOS
>INTERNALS website
>
>
>
>Not much to report - and nothing for some time either !
>
>QL Hard disc forma
Not much to report - and nothing for some time either !
QL Hard disc format added.
A quick correction to one of the examples (Trap #1, D0 = $OA - MT_ACTIV)
Some preparitory work for 'forthcoming updates'.
Changed my email address details on the Quantum Ring bit at the bottom.
Pretty boring reall
25 matches
Mail list logo
