Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> > The problem with this theory is that I have QMac 1.01 which,
> > according to John Gilpin, is still the version that Quanta
> > supply...
>
> Well, I have V1.06 here... (with QLINK 1.03), so this might really
> be the reason.
Yes. Thanks, Marcel.
As I say, I have now f
Norman Dunbar writes:
> found it !
Well, I dare say your brain is not as deficient as you make out, considering
Ive had four years in which to find a solution while you did it in your
coffee break! Notice, I make no mention of those who should have taken my
initial report seriously and figured
John Hall wrote:
> The problem with this theory is that I have QMac 1.01 which, according
> to John Gilpin, is still the version that Quanta supply...
Well, I have V1.06 here... (with QLINK 1.03), so this might really be
the reason.
Marcel
Hi John,
> I'm not saying it's your fault. On the other hand, my QMake
> documentation does not say anything about the version of QMac that is
> required/supported.
Oh, it says you should use it together with the latest version of
Quanta assembler, because older versions don't support all the
f
Jochen Merz wrote:
> well, this could be the solution. The version of QMAC we all have
> (at least Bernd and myself) is 1.06.
>
> Sorry, but it is not quite our fault if the version which Quanta
> delivers is so very much out of date. Our version 1.06 dates back
> to March 1998 ("only" over 4 ye
Hi John,
> I have now adapted my SB interceptor program (see thread "SMSQ/E &
> QMake") to remove "-XERROR -PC" from the command string and then send
> it to QMac. Guess what? Per's test case now assembles and links
> without complaint!
Not surprising at all. That's why Pers examples never fail
://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Norman Dunbar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 4:18 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Per,
found it !
-XERROR a
> It seems to me that the root of the problem is the command string
> that QMake is sending to QMac, which in turn implies that Jochen,
> Bernt and Marcel have a version of QMac that understands "-XERROR"
> while you, me and Norman do not!
I have now adapted my SB interceptor program (see thread
Per,
found it !
-XERROR and -PC are not permitted options in the version of QMAC that I have
(Quanta 0.10). I have used a file editor to change these options to spaces
in the qmake executable.
Next problem, my version of qmac doesn't accept CHR(9) as a tab character -
it gives 'error 0F Invali
L: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: John Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 3:09 PM
To: QL Users
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Per Witte wrote:
> Loading the link file into Qmak
Hi John,
well, this could be the solution. The version of QMAC we all have
(at least Bernd and myself) is 1.06.
Sorry, but it is not quite our fault if the version which Quanta
delivers is so very much out of date. Our version 1.06 dates back
to March 1998 ("only" over 4 years) and, thinking ab
Per Witte wrote:
> Loading the link file into Qmake V4.21 I get:
>
> Error: ram1_abc_asm not found.
>
> Now, you can bet your bottom euro that that file DOES exist! There
> is no explanation as to whats going on, no log file and no other
> error message.
Like Norman, I have duplicated your
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I have created a test case exactly the same as Per's - and had
> exactly the same results - ram1_abc_asm not found.
Me too!
Please see my reply to Per for my theory on what is going on...
John
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel,
so I tried setting my language code to 49 - ha ha ha !
Now then where the hell is the underscore gone - trying to remember my time
in Munich working at a customer site . Found it on the SHIFT '?' key,
now I can ex win1_qmake_qmake :o)
I still get the same problem.
I'm using the ve
//www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Merz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Hi Norman,
No, Bernd Reinhardt has. Bu
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I'm sure the problem is quite simple to fix, it's just difficult to track
> down.
Well, the platforms should be quite similar (QPC). The only difference
is the boot up process and the contents of the hard disc, possibly
also QPC settings but I don't expect any problems fr
Hi Norman,
> I presume you have accesss to Qmake's source code ?
No, Bernd Reinhardt has. But I'm sure he will be helpful
if you contact him directly.
> If so, what exactly does it do to determine that a file with asm extension
> is more recent than the file with the rel extension when the rel
: Jochen Merz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Hi Norman,
> cheers for that.
>
> I'm using the latest version of QPC - it wouldn't be that would it ?
Hi Norman,
> cheers for that.
>
> I'm using the latest version of QPC - it wouldn't be that would it ?
> Did you try it on QPC or on a 'proper' (don't flame me please) non-emulated
> SMSQ - just out of interest ?
When Per complained first I was using the ATARI TT version,
where it worked all th
August 19, 2002 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Hi Per & Norman,
I have tried your example, Per, created the three files and
assembled them with your settings. It worked!
What else can I say? I've also tried modifying the
Hi Per & Norman,
I have tried your example, Per, created the three files and
assembled them with your settings. It worked!
What else can I say? I've also tried modifying the settings,
using a different Linker - it also worked.
Sorry, no clue at all.
Maybe Marcel can give clues as he seems to b
3 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: P Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Jochen Merz writes:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Stupid remark, but have you checked the case of the filename, maybe qmake
checks names case dependent and is there a difference between the name on
disk and in the makefile... (just a thought).
Joachim
Thi
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
>
> I'm afraid I have exactly the same results with Marcel's 4.24 version as I
> do with the new 4.27 version. 'Header_asm' cannot be fou
: ql-users
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Jochen Merz wrote:
> However, I've never tried to assemble SMSQ, so I think we need to
> look forward to Marcels help: he generates SMSQ/Es, as we all know.
There's nothing special to SMSQ. It j
Jochen Merz writes:
> Per and myself mailed several times about his problems.
> I am using QMAKE for assembling all my sources, including QD, MENU
> and QSPread - and the link files are rather complex.
>
> However, I've never tried to assemble SMSQ, so I think we need to
> look forward to Marcel
Jochen Merz wrote:
> However, I've never tried to assemble SMSQ, so I think we need to
> look forward to Marcels help: he generates SMSQ/Es, as we all know.
There's nothing special to SMSQ. It just works here. Did also convert
one _link file to dev8_ without problem. Will send Norman my binary
Hi,
Per and myself mailed several times about his problems.
I am using QMAKE for assembling all my sources, including QD, MENU
and QSPread - and the link files are rather complex.
However, I've never tried to assemble SMSQ, so I think we need to
look forward to Marcels help: he generates SMSQ/E
: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: P Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] qmake, the source and my inferior brain
Norman Dunbar writes:
<>
>
Norman Dunbar writes:
<>
> I cannot get qmake to work :o)
>
> Here's what I did :
<>
> Anybody got any helpful ideas ?
I have no helpful ideas whatsoever on this problem. Otherwise I would have
sorted it out on my own behalf any time these last four years ;( For my
own work, which is somewhat
Afternoon all.
In an effort to (a) get a binary dev8 version of smsq and test it agains a
binary win1 verison, and (b) to try to get this list talking again (!) I
have tried to build smsq using qmake.
Qmake has arrived (Thanks Jochen) been installed and configured to pick up
my qmac and qlink f
31 matches
Mail list logo
