You've probably added QLers to the spelling database at some point.
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: Derek Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 May 2005 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Spellcheck
Tried this in Word 2003, seems to be a correct spelling...
H
Nope, sorry, I do not really use the spellchecker... as the MS Word
spellchecking is not proper English.
Derek
Darren Branagh wrote:
You've probably added QLers to the spelling database at some point.
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: Derek Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 May 2
I have noticed that SMSQE v3.04 will allow such names as end_if to be used as
variables or procedure names. So apparently does SMSQE v3.10. However, SMSQE
v3.07 sets end_if, end_def, end_when, end_for and end_sel to END IF, END DEF,
END WHEN, END FOR and END SEL.
Has anyone else noticed this? I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have noticed that SMSQE v3.04 will allow such names as end_if to be used as
> variables or procedure names. So apparently does SMSQE v3.10. However, SMSQE
> v3.07 sets end_if, end_def, end_when, end_for and end_sel to END IF, END DEF,
> END WHEN, END FOR and END SEL.
M
On 5 May 2005 at 9:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have noticed that SMSQE v3.04 will allow such names as end_if to be used as
> variables or procedure names. So apparently does SMSQE v3.10. However, SMSQE
> v3.07 sets end_if, end_def, end_when, end_for and end_sel to END IF, END DEF,
> END WH
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wolfgang Lenerz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 5 May 2005 at 9:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that SMSQE v3.04 will allow such names as end_if to be
used as
variables or procedure names. So apparently does SMSQE v3.10. However, SMSQE
v3.07 sets end_if,
On 5 May 2005 at 20:23, Roy wood wrote:
(...)
> Talking of versions, are we likely to see 3.10 soon. EasyPTR v4 needs
> this to work correctly.
Yes, today or tomorrow.
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
___
QL-U
