Re: Kevin Mitnik

1999-04-03 Thread Scott D. Yelich
All told, Mitnick will serve another 8 months and then be freed on parole. Stipulations of the plea also entail that he not personally benefit from the incidents which lead up to his arrest (e.g., no big "book deal" for personal gain), and that he make restitution to the adversely

Re: Kevin Mitnik

1999-04-03 Thread Scott D. Yelich
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, blip wrote: Isnt this the same guy that was "jailed" without being charged? morgan *sigh* No, he was charged. He has spent like 4 years in prison and he's going to get a plea bargain deal where he'll probably get 5 years, of which he's already served 4. Another reason

MD5 in djb-c?

1999-04-03 Thread Russell Nelson
Has anyone coded MD5 (message digest 5) in djb-style C? -- -russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1

Re: Melissa Virus

1999-04-03 Thread Steve Manes
At 09:57 PM 4/2/99 -0700, Scott wrote: If companies would just get it that ALL of their PC users need training and rules to follow (like never turn off macro protection or you get canned) If this is the case.. then why have macros be able to be executed in the first place? It seems that

Re: maildir and You have new mail

1999-04-03 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
According to Lenny Mastrototaro: On Apr 2, 12:19am, William Burrow wrote: Subject: Re: maildir and "You have new mail" Why would someone do an ls on their Maildir? Just curious. I occasionally do this to find the luser with the message with a 20MB QuickTime attached. Why should I

Re: MD5 in djb-c?

1999-04-03 Thread Russell Nelson
Russell Nelson wrote: Has anyone coded MD5 (message digest 5) in djb-style C? Coincidentally, Dan published http://pobox.com/~djb/hash127.html a few hours before I sent that message. hash127 is nice, but unless it interoperates with other devices that do an MD5 (in particular, Cisco's

smtp-poplock problem

1999-04-03 Thread Ed Weinberg
I am trying to get smtp-poplock working. I currently have an RH5.2 test system set up. I have qmail runnig and pop3 works fine. I use inetd (please no flames about running indetd!). I followed the install instructions and still seem to have something wrong. If readlog is not started and

Re: smtp-poplock problem

1999-04-03 Thread Ed Weinberg
On Sat, 03 Apr 1999 21:22:11 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Weinberg) wrote: I am trying to get smtp-poplock working. One last question. Is there an rcpthosts file when using mtp-poplock? -- Ed Weinberg, Detel, Inc., An Internet Presence Provider [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AOL Cname lookup failure???

1999-04-03 Thread Bill Parker
Hello All, I get a message from AOHell users in my /var/mail/log which states the following: Apr 3 13:36:19 odie qmail: 923175379.711394 starting delivery 1798: msg 356449 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 3 13:36:19 odie qmail: 923175379.711795 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20 Apr 3

Re: AOL Cname lookup failure???

1999-04-03 Thread Chris Johnson
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 02:21:31PM -0800, Bill Parker wrote: Hello All, I get a message from AOHell users in my /var/mail/log which states the following: Apr 3 13:36:19 odie qmail: 923175379.711394 starting delivery 1798: msg 356449 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 3 13:36:19

qmail Digest 3 Apr 1999 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 599

1999-04-03 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 3 Apr 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 599 Topics (messages 23879 through 23896): maildir and "You have new mail" 23879 by: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23880 by: Miquel van Smoorenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23889 by: "Lenny Mastrototaro" [EMAIL PROTECTED]