Has anyone updated this for qmail 1.03? The current one is for 1.01.
(BTW, the mail link for Mark Delany on the qmail web page is out of date,
too.)
Jim Lippard [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.discord.org/
Unsolicited bulk email charge: $500/message. Don't send me any.
PGP Fingerpri
"Olivier M." wrote:
> > And what is the solution? There is user "t.v.ship" and he has FTP and HTTP
> > access also, on the same server. Now I have to rename him? I have a lot of
> > such users. Each user have to have an alias?
> > Is there a way to disable this feature?
>
> No, it should be n
Hiyah,
You could use qmail's assign file and Paul Gregg's poppasswd program, this
will allow you to maintain a separate user/passwd file just for qmail
check out http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.txt
Regads
Gary Barnden
At 12:01 23/08/99 +0500, you wrote:
>John Gonz
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 12:01:10PM +0500, Dmitry Niqiforoff wrote:
> John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> > Qmail changes all dots to the : character ':' -- you might want to search
> > all the documentation, including the LWQ (life with qmail) home page. It
> > has what you need.
> > http://web.in
John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
> Qmail changes all dots to the : character ':' -- you might want to search
> all the documentation, including the LWQ (life with qmail) home page. It
> has what you need.
>
> http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#dots-in-extensions
>
> specifically :)
And wh
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 10:56:08AM +0500, Dmitry Niqiforoff wrote:
> Yesterday I moved from sendmail to qmail and now I got a problem.
> The problem is it doesn't recognizes usernames with dots in it. For
> [..] Is there a way to force qmail to process messages for such users
> correctly?
What
Qmail changes all dots to the : character ':' -- you might want to search
all the documentation, including the LWQ (life with qmail) home page. It
has what you need.
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#dots-in-extensions
specifically :)
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Dmitry Niqiforoff wrote:
>Hello!
Hello!
Yesterday I moved from sendmail to qmail and now I got a problem.
The problem is it doesn't recognizes usernames with dots in it. For
example, there is a user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", and qmail can not
deliver a message to him: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox
here by that name. (#5.1.
Ahhh... found it in the qmail-ldap patch.
http://www.nrg4u.com/
Sorry for the noise,
jon
I wrote 8 minutes ago:
>About two weeks ago I stumbled upon a checkpassword implementation
>that could check passwords against post.office (from software.com)
>encrypted passwords. Now I can't find it
About two weeks ago I stumbled upon a checkpassword implementation
that could check passwords against post.office (from software.com)
encrypted passwords. Now I can't find it anywhere. Doh! Anyone got a
link to such a beast?
thanks,
jon
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:50:03 +1000 (EST)
From: Peter Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: John Conover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: auth/identd?
On 23 Aug 1999, John Conover wrote:
> Peter Samuel writes:
> >
> > If you run qmail-smtpd from either inetd/
Peter Samuel writes:
>
> If you run qmail-smtpd from either inetd/tcp-env or tcpserver then the
> default operation is to do identd lookups. However, you can turn these
> off by using the -R option to either tcpenv or tcpserver. See the man
> pages for both.
>
> This one is from tcp-env(1):
>
>
On 21 Aug 1999, John Conover wrote:
>
> Qmail does not use auth/identd, right?
>
Maybe :)
If you run qmail-smtpd from either inetd/tcp-env or tcpserver then the
default operation is to do identd lookups. However, you can turn these
off by using the -R option to either tcpenv or tcpserver. See t
qmail Digest 22 Aug 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 736
Topics (messages 29303 through 29310):
daemontools binaries (was Re: binaries)
29303 by: Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've been doing some relay testing.
29304 by: Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
auth/identd?
29305 b
14 matches
Mail list logo
