y answered before I aksed it on
> the list but this is making it a bit difficult. Does anyone have the FAQ on
> file?
>
> Vivian Lal
>
> http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail/faq.html
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
>
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it and the controller
> > > rebuilds it?
> >
> > Nothing. You're covered at the inode level.
> >
> > But that doesn't mean the RAID 5 is good to use. Use 1+0 instead.
> >
> > --
> > John White johnjohn
> > at
> >triceratops.com
> > PGP Public Key: http://www.triceratops.com/john/public-key.pgp
> >
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
esn't mean the RAID 5 is good to use. Use 1+0 instead.
>
> RAID 1+0 is provides more redundancy AND io speed than RAID 5.
>
> --
> John White johnjohn
> at
> triceratops.com
> PGP Public Key: http://www.triceratops.com/john/public-key.pgp
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Daemeon Reiydelle wrote:
>
> > Just a performance comment. Qmail is IO bound. Adding additional
> > subdirectories force additional stat'ing of inode/vnode structures. ...
>
> Only if you're actually delivering to the
to the RAID client, which then uses it to format and
> use a filesystem.
>
> Presumably, if a disk fails, the RAID controller will rebuild its contents
> in a transparent fashion so that the filesystem client can't tell the
> difference.
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hed, and I am running qmail with the unlimit command.
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance you can give.
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
es some
> documentation of what I did, plus some source code.
>
> Currently, the mechanism allows for one level of subfolders only. I'm
> currently thinking of ways to implement a subfolder hierarchy. For various
> reasons, I'm leaning against implementing a subfolder hierarchy using
> nested subdirectories. Instead, I'm leaning towards using a hierarchy
> separator character in the name of each subfolder, a'la IMAP.
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> csh -f '/var/qmail/rc' &
> echo "qmail started..."
>
> /basit
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has any one modified Qmail (or any other MTA) so it does final delivery
via Corba, Talarian, or Technicron?
I would be interested in comparing notes.
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as mostly in the mail headers and return paths that I saw repeated
malloc calls. The changed algorithm cut malloc calls by about 10% as I
recall. 10% isn't a big deal, but if you are now processor bound (with
prestoserv or solid state devices ...).
Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> D
r the last allocation,
then reallocate twice the space when the current area runs out of room.
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l, so it
looks like there might be a race condition. Did I miss something?
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes
>
> Thanks you.
>
> Subba Rao
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==
> Disclaimer - I question and speak for myself.
>
> http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
> __
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
much like to understand the
circumstances under which qmail-spawn could become a bottleneck.
Russel, please let us know what the symptoms were.
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s pretty quick AND stateless.
>
> Well, I don't mean to just pop up on the list and start asking for free
> advice, but if anyone is in the mood to talk, I would love to hear any
> advice or comments.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jack
>
> ______
still, you're gonna get the whole thing.
>
> The context of the discussion is messages on disk. Perhaps you have
> some other point you are making?
>
> -- Jeff
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> > > script that runs qmail-inject 1000 times
> > > with a 1000 byte body
> > > Qmail-send is not running
> > >
> > > Result:
> > > takes 73 seconds (13.7/sec)
> > >
> > > This se
ems a little slow to me. The system cpu is 70% idle.
>
> Same experiment with "cat >> out.file < 1000byte.in" takes 4 seconds.
>
> Is this normal ? Any ideas on how to speed it up.
>
> thanks,
> -jim
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ble concurrencyremote (>30), you will need to increase
> the
> fd limit. But even if you do, you *can't* bring concurrencyremote over
> 256.
>
> David.
> __
> David Villeger
> (212) 972 2030 x34
>
> http://ww
Dave Sill wrote:
>
> Daemeon Reiydelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Since the bottleneck will be your internet pipe, ...
>
> Probably the spool disk, unless you've got multiple boxes flooding the
> pipe.
A couple of pieces. Performance tuning any
the major-vendor-style support available from RedHat to other
Linux
packager's solutions.
>
> --
> -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
> Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1
#x27;re given--the people who buy the
> hardware rarely have any ties to the people who have to use it.
>
> I appreciate your input...
>
> Cris Daniluk
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lex Shipp
> Imagineer
> St@r Internet
> E - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> T - 01285 884496
> F - 01285 887013
>
>
>
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the Star Screening System
> http://academy.star.co.uk/public/virustats.htm
--
Daemeon Reiydelle
Systems Engineer, Anthropomorphics Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 matches
Mail list logo
