Fortuantely, only about 5% or so of the laws actually passed by this
"useful" group ever actually make it into every state's law. For as
unproductive and unsuccessful as they are, it's a wonder the commission
exists. I'm not too frightened about UCITA becoming a bill. Especially not
in my state
Some companies don't want to have to make that argument :)
-Original Message-
From: Fred Lindberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kurt's Closet on qmail
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:01:38 +0100, Petr Novotny
Unless redundancy is important over striping :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 1:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAID 5 and queue restore
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 01:22:08PM -0500, wrote:
Your problem is not QMail, it's disk. We've been configuring an array of
servers to allow us to send approximately 1000 messages per second from a
span of 4 servers, each running 4 separate qmail queues on 4 separate disks.
My first recommendation is to turn up the concurrencyremote. The
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 3:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Qmail List
Subject: Re: Any ideas?
: Your problem is not QMail, it's disk. We've been
configuring an array of
: servers to allow us to send
I think this has been done. Repeatedly.
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas MONNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 1999 3:55 PM
To: Russell Nelson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail.com blacklisting
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Linux swaps. It always does. It has no relevance on performance unless its
doing a lot of it. Linux will nice a process down so low that it will decide
it's not even worth memory because it never uses it and swap it. It is
BETTER to swap this memory than waste it, which is why Linux does it.
How on earth can you block based on volume?
Our company sends out alerts to subscribers daily. This is very high volume
and only sent to those who explicitly request it. That most certainly is not
spam. The very nature of what you do lends itself to receiving high mail
counts that are
Title: RE: email postage
Back in the day, most services charged for email by the line. I remember on a few systems (Compuserve being one) they started to let you have the subject line for free. To exploit their generosity, we would type our entire email messages in the subject line. Not very
Title: tcpserver
What is the max connections you can set for tcpserver? Currently we are running about 500, but we are going to turn it up to 1000 today to increase performance. Does tcpserver have any objections to this? Also, perhaps foremost, from a scalability standpoint--will it hit a
Title: RE: Qmail dying
File permissions?
-Original Message-
From: Fred Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 1999 1:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Qmail dying
Qmail keeps dying completely, leaving no qmail processes
running, or partly
dying
Title: qmail-remote
Does qmail-remote have a way of telling qmail-send whether or not a message was delivered successfully? It appears that it does, but it is not clear since according to the Big Picture by Mr Opperman, qmail-rspawn calls qmail-remote, not qmail-send. Would it be possible for
Title: RE: Case Sensitive
This is very inaccurate. I spent the last week reading over the SMTP RFC and here's a quote from page 3 section 2:
Commands and replies are not case sensitive. That is, a command or reply word may be upper case, lower case, or any mixture of upper and lower case.
Title: QMTP
Are there any NT implementations of QMTP available? I'd like to drastically speed the time that it takes our MS SMTP Server to populate the qmail queue and this is one logical and probably most efficient way to do it. If there's no such thing available, are there any open source
Title: RE: reverse DNS
This happens in corporate situations with firewalled networks a lot. I speak from unfortunate experience :)
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 10:41 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: reverse DNS
Title: RE: humble suggestion from a confused boy
A lot of people also make functionally equivalent. Perhaps just a central table that has each patch, its latest revision date, its current status, etc. so people can differentiate between them.
Cris Daniluk
MicroStrategy
-Original
Title: RE: Performance issues
That sounds like something completely unrelated to qmail on first hearing, but what message does the mailer give? For example sometimes my mailer will say cannot find the address but I click on details and it will give a completely and totally different response.
Why not have the user send via an alternate account that uses the smtp
server of the main office directly that way it is only sent once. This is
very easy to do in Outlook, Outlook Express, Eudora, Netscape, etc. and it
requires virtually no effort on your part.
Cris Daniluk
MicroStrategy
I've noticed a couple times that qmail will stop preprocessing messages and
the queue will have say a thousand messages, but 900 of them will not yet be
preprocessed. Giving an ALRM to qmail-send does not seem to make a
difference. Is there anything that would trigger this? It's certainly got
!
:)
Cris
-Original Message-
From: Daniluk, Cris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 6:29 PM
To: QMail (E-mail)
Subject: queue not preprocessing
I've noticed a couple times that qmail will stop
preprocessing messages and
the queue will have say a thousand
It is actually prw--w---... is this a prob?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 6:37 PM
To: Daniluk, Cris
Cc: 'QMail (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: queue not preprocessing
On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 01:31:54PM -0400, Daniluk
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: queue not preprocessing
"Daniluk, Cris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is actually prw--w---... is this a prob?
Yup. Let me guess: you "fixed" it because you saw it was world
22 matches
Mail list logo
