What commands can I put in a .qmail file so that email from a specific
email address is dropped (/dev/null'd), but all other email is delivered
fine?
Lenny Mastrototaro said once upon a time (Mon, 7 Jun 1999):
> BTW, I'm using a stock qmail 1.0.1 installation.
qmail 1.0.3 relaxes that restiction and allows for incorrect MX records
that are only IP addresses.
Where can I find a copy of the above? I looked through the tarball but
couldn't find anything.
http://www.ishmail.com/
A very nice full featured mail client. Just needs to be converted to GTK
instead of Motif (yuck).
Dax Kelson
Timothy L. Mayo said once upon a time (Thu, 6 May 1999):
> You are correct and I was wrong. smtproutes does not need the []s.
> dns_ip() is coded such that it is simply looking for a dotted quad IP
> address, regardless of whether there are braces. :)
It used to require []s.
Go DAN!!! I can wait for qmail2 if this is what your up too...
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,0-36217,00.html?st.ne.lh..ni
Does anyone have a URL to that qmail-smtpd patch?
Dax Kelson
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Jere Cassidy wrote:
>
> > Re: Attachment:
> > I wonder how many qmail users got this one!
>
> I did at one of the other domains I handle.
>
> > At the risk of publisizing the program, it is located at
> > http://www.earthonline
You are assuming the security breach was in the ftp server.
Dax Kelson
On 25 Jan 1999, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is probably better sent to a different list, but I'd start using
> Dan's FTP daemon rather than a huge package like wu-ftpd that I really
> don't trust i
I believe Dan said that under solaris the resolver library is statically
linked only.
On 22 Jan 1999, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Andrew Richards writes:
> > As someone looking at using Qmail on Solaris, what is the issue with
> > Solaris alluded to above?
>
> Solaris fritters away quite a bit of
Has anyone (Dan?) done real-world bandwidth measurements of how qmail
compares bandwidth wise to sendmail/zmailer/exim/postfix?
A common complaint I hear is "qmail would use way more bandwidth, then XXX
MTA".
It would be nice to point them at some number to take a look.
Dax Kelso
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Dax Kelson wrote:
> If the list has a < 20 second turn around like the qmail list, those
> things wouldn't happen.
Actually it is more like 1-2 seconds.
yet).
If the list has a < 20 second turn around like the qmail list, those
things wouldn't happen.
But like Russell said, David Miller has been refusing to even *look* at
qmail for 3 years.
Dax Kelson
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:45:15 +
From: Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dax Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Aaron Tiensivu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Qmail for Vger campaign :)
Reality che
On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Len Budney wrote:
> Hi Vince,
>
> Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...badmailto...I'm getting around 10 or 20 double bounces a day from
> > these two addresses, and in the past we've had other problems with
> > nonexistant addresses that double bounce...
>
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 10:40:41 -0600
From: Nelson Bunker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IIS 4.0 SMTPSVC vs. QMAIL
To whom it may concern--
Our establishment has started to use IIS4.0 option pack SMTP service
(post SP4) for ou
On 23 Dec 1998, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Anyway, folks, thanks for participating in the mailing list volume test.
> On the mailing list machine, at concurrency 120, qmail sustained a rate
> of 1.5 million deliveries/day. Enjoy the holidays.
>
> ---Dan
How many subscribers are there to the qma
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 15:02:30 -0500
From: Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Bugtraq List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Postfix design directions
This is an invitation for constructive discussion regarding the
merits of wor
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Dax Kelson wrote:
> Sounds like Dan is *promoting* "Frivolous Incompatibilities" with the rest
> of the Unix universe.
This is also frivolously incompatible with the rest of qmail.
Under DJB's line of reasoning why have *any* control files??? It
ing* "Frivolous Incompatibilities" with the rest
of the Unix universe.
Dax Kelson
Internet Connect, Inc.
Russell, you are scarying me. You sound like DJB. :)
On 23 Dec 1998, Russell Nelson wrote:
> D. J. Bernstein writes:
> > If it's okay to reinstall /etc/aliases.db in a cleanup, why isn't it
> > okay to reinstall the qmail files?
>
> I've already explained that; you haven't refuted it. You'
21 matches
Mail list logo
