Is anyone else getting memory errors on starting /var/qmail/rc
(qmail-start) when compiled with egcs in OpenBSD-current? If I compile
with -O2 I get the memory error; with -O1 it seems to work OK.
Evan
> If someone controlled the reverse mapping for a range of IP addresses and
knew
> your domain name, he could make one of his addresses reverse map to a name
in
> your domain and gain access you don't want him to have.
You can compare the forwards and reverse nameservice to make sure that they
ar
> I don't see what this has to do with anything. Sendmail didn't come
> with a pop3 program. You need checkpasswd only if you're going to use
> qmail-pop3d. It's true that if you're going to continue to use
> qpopper, as I have, you need to hack it a little to get ./Mailbox and
> XTND XMIT work
Hi Doug,
> What is the *best* means to use the RBL, DUL, Shubs, and others, with
> qmail-smtpd and be able to allow our dialups to relay?
tcpserver/tcprules will take care of the selective relaying, and rblsmtpd
(available from ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/pub/software/) will handle RBL
for you
E
> i thought about this one this weekend, if /bin/false is in /etc/shells
> and you have ftp enabled, then a user could ftp in a .qmail file that
> contains a expect script that runs chsh, and boom, they have a shell. how
> to avoid this, options:
/bin/false should never be in /etc/shells, period
Well, I might as well add my voice to the chorus...
>I wish to send the content of a text file to users on my system without
>attaching it.
What about a simple "mail user < file"?
Evan
>It hasn't improved over itself much since 1.00, so the reasons
>probably haven't changed since their last evaluation, which was
>negative.
qmail itself hasn't had terribly major changes, but a lot of things have
been added along side qmail which make it much more attractive, such as
dot-forward,
>What I am trying to do is filter incoming mail... for example, for mail
>coming in from the qmail mailing list, move the mail to the 'Qmail
Mailing
>List' IMAP folder in my directory. Also the same type of rule for the
RedHat
>mailing list, or for mail from a paticular person.
Assuming you're us
>Is there a way to get the qmail-smtpd to use some form of delivery
rules,
>similar to procmail 'recipies'? I am using IMAP and would like to
filter the
>mail on the server when it comes in.
I think you mean "Is there a way to get qmail-local to use some form of
delivery rules," because you want
>Agreed. That kind of message is issued when the file is there, but
>isn't readable. I probably shouldn't have used my favorite example in
>that example. :-)
Ah! My apologies. Yes, that would be nice.
Evan
>If it can't read a control file, it should say so, to stderr.
>(e.g. "unable to read rcpthosts")
Just a note that usually it is not an error for a control file to be
missing. The control files mostly only override default settings. For
rcpthosts in particular, my complaint would be that the de
>That would be a waste of time. Dan doesn't trust Redhat; Redhat
>doesn't trust Dan. Note that Redhat is not unique in this regard.
Nor is Dan, I might add. I would rather gnaw off my arm than use
something from Redhat.
Personally I think that this has gone way too far. I agree with Dan
that
12 matches
Mail list logo
